• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Focus groups inform a web-based program to increase fruit and vegetable intake.焦点小组为一个基于网络的增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的项目提供信息。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Nov;77(2):314-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.032. Epub 2009 May 5.
2
Older adults' perceptions of using iPads for improving fruit and vegetable intake: an exploratory study.老年人对使用iPad改善水果和蔬菜摄入量的看法:一项探索性研究。
Care Manag J. 2015;16(1):2-13. doi: 10.1891/1521-0987.16.1.2.
3
Development and preliminary evaluation of an internet-based healthy eating program: randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的健康饮食计划的开发与初步评估:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 10;16(10):e231. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3534.
4
Feasibility of using a web-based nutrition intervention among residents of multiethnic working-class neighborhoods.在多民族工人阶级社区居民中开展基于网络的营养干预措施的可行性。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Jul;4(3):A55. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
5
A comparison of smokers' and nonsmokers' fruit and vegetable intake and relevant psychosocial factors.吸烟者与非吸烟者的水果和蔬菜摄入量及相关心理社会因素的比较。
Behav Med. 2009 Spring;35(1):14-22. doi: 10.3200/BMED.35.1.14-22.
6
A family-based intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in adolescents: a pilot study.基于家庭的干预措施以增加青少年的水果和蔬菜摄入量:一项试点研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jun;13(6):876-85. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000121. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
7
Education or Provision? A Comparison of Two School-Based Fruit and Vegetable Nutrition Education Programs in the Netherlands.教育还是供应?荷兰两项基于学校的水果和蔬菜营养教育计划的比较。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 26;12(11):3280. doi: 10.3390/nu12113280.
8
Changes in fruit and vegetable consumption of third-grade students in body quest: food of the warrior, a 17-class childhood obesity prevention program.“身体探索:战士的食物”(一项为期17节课的儿童肥胖预防项目)中三年级学生水果和蔬菜摄入量的变化
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(4):286-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
9
Tailoring a fruit and vegetable intervention on novel motivational constructs: results of a randomized study.根据新的动机结构调整果蔬干预措施:一项随机研究的结果。
Ann Behav Med. 2008 Apr;35(2):159-69. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9028-9.
10
Dietary planning, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancies play a role in an online intervention on fruit and vegetable consumption.饮食规划、自我效能和结果预期在一项关于水果和蔬菜消费的在线干预中发挥作用。
Psychol Health. 2018 May;33(5):652-668. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1385785. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying What Matters to Hysterectomy Patients: Postsurgery Perceptions, Beliefs, and Experiences.确定子宫切除术患者关心的事项:术后认知、信念及经历
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2018;5(2):167-175. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1581. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
HealthyDads.ca: What Do Men Want in a Website Designed to Promote Emotional Wellness and Healthy Behaviors During the Transition to Parenthood?HealthyDads.ca:在一个旨在促进男性向为人父角色转变过程中的情绪健康和健康行为的网站中,男性想要什么?
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 11;19(10):e325. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7415.
3
The Effect of Changes in Health Beliefs Among African-American and Rural White Church Congregants Enrolled in an Obesity Intervention: A Qualitative Evaluation.参与肥胖干预的非裔美国人和农村白人教会会众健康观念变化的影响:一项定性评估
J Community Health. 2016 Jun;41(3):518-25. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0125-y.
4
Social-cognitive correlates of fruit and vegetable consumption in minority and non-minority youth.少数民族和非少数民族青少年水果和蔬菜消费的社会认知相关性。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Mar;45(2):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.11.006. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
5
The influence of cognitive-perceptual variables on patterns of change over time in rural midlife and older women's healthy eating.认知知觉变量对农村中年和老年女性健康饮食习惯随时间变化模式的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(4):659-67. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
6
A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption.一项评估在线干预措施以改善水果和蔬菜消费的随机临床试验。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):319-26. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154468. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption.一项评估在线干预措施以改善水果和蔬菜消费的随机临床试验。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):319-26. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154468. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
2
Tailoring a fruit and vegetable intervention on novel motivational constructs: results of a randomized study.根据新的动机结构调整果蔬干预措施:一项随机研究的结果。
Ann Behav Med. 2008 Apr;35(2):159-69. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9028-9.
3
Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior.自我调节、自我效能感、结果期望和社会支持:社会认知理论与营养行为。
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;34(3):304-12. doi: 10.1007/BF02874555.
4
A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change.电子健康干预对身体活动和饮食行为改变的综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Oct;33(4):336-345. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.007.
5
Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.量身定制重要吗?针对印刷品健康行为改变干预措施的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):673-93. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673.
6
Nutrition knowledge, attitudes and fat intake: application of the theory of reasoned action.营养知识、态度与脂肪摄入量:理性行动理论的应用
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007 Jun;20(3):159-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00776.x.
7
Have Americans increased their fruit and vegetable intake? The trends between 1988 and 2002.美国人增加了他们对水果和蔬菜的摄入量吗?1988年至2002年的趋势。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Apr;32(4):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.002.
8
Associations of psychosocial factors with fruit and vegetable intake among African-Americans.非裔美国人心理社会因素与果蔬摄入量的关联
Public Health Nutr. 2007 Jul;10(7):701-11. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007662284. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
9
Fruit and vegetable consumption among adults--United States, 2005.2005年美国成年人的水果和蔬菜摄入量
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Mar 16;56(10):213-7.
10
What should we eat? Evidence from observational studies.我们应该吃什么?来自观察性研究的证据。
South Med J. 2006 Jul;99(7):744-8. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000220887.52952.f0.

焦点小组为一个基于网络的增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的项目提供信息。

Focus groups inform a web-based program to increase fruit and vegetable intake.

机构信息

HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1524, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Nov;77(2):314-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.032. Epub 2009 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.032
PMID:19409750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2767451/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To use focus groups to inform a web-based educational intervention for increased fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption.

METHODS

Twelve groups (participants=137, aged 21-65) were recruited from four geographically diverse health systems. Four groups were stratified by gender and eight by race (white and African American) and gender. Questions included perceptions of healthy eating, factors that encourage or serve as barriers to FV consumption and features preferred for a web-based educational intervention.

RESULTS

Though knowledgeable about healthy eating, participants did not know how to achieve or always care about healthy nutritional choices. Motivators for FV consumption included being role models and health concerns. Barriers included: lack of time, expense and FV availability. Website preferences included: visuals, links, tailored materials, menu suggestions, goal setting assistance, printable summaries and built in motivation. The developers incorporated nearly all suggestions.

CONCLUSION

Focus groups provided needs-based tactical strategies for an online, education intervention targeting factors to improve FV consumption.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Focus groups can provide valuable input to inform interventions. Further, web-based programs' abilities to offer information without time or geographic constraints, with capacity for tailoring and tracking progress makes them a valuable addition in the arsenal of efforts to promote healthy behaviors.

摘要

目的

利用焦点小组为基于网络的增加水果和蔬菜(FV)消费的教育干预提供信息。

方法

从四个地理位置不同的医疗系统中招募了 137 名年龄在 21-65 岁之间的参与者,共分为 12 组。其中 4 组按性别分层,8 组按种族(白人和非裔美国人)和性别分层。问题包括对健康饮食的看法、鼓励或阻碍 FV 消费的因素以及对基于网络的教育干预的偏好特征。

结果

尽管参与者对健康饮食有一定的了解,但他们不知道如何实现或始终关注健康的营养选择。FV 消费的动机包括成为榜样和关注健康。障碍包括缺乏时间、费用和 FV 的供应。网站偏好包括:视觉效果、链接、定制材料、菜单建议、目标设定辅助、可打印摘要和内置动机。开发者几乎纳入了所有建议。

结论

焦点小组为针对改善 FV 消费的因素的在线教育干预提供了基于需求的策略。

实践意义

焦点小组可以为干预措施提供有价值的意见。此外,基于网络的程序能够在不受时间和地理限制的情况下提供信息,具有定制和跟踪进度的能力,使它们成为促进健康行为的努力的有力补充。