Walters Jaime K, Boswell Laura E, Green Mandy K, Heumann Michael A, Karam Lauren E, Morrissey Barbara F, Waltz Justin E
Oregon Department of Human Services, Public Health Division, Office of Environmental Public Health, Toxicology, Assessment, & Tracking Services, Oregon Worker Illness and Injury Prevention Program, Portland, OR 97232, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2009 Jan-Feb;124(1):149-59. doi: 10.1177/003335490912400118.
Pyrethrin and pyrethroid insecticides are commonly applied in homes and businesses and on some agricultural crops. This research used a two-state regional approach to analyze reports of acute pesticide poisonings due to pyrethrin and pyrethroid insecticides.
The Washington State Department of Health and the Oregon Public Health Division collected pesticide poisoning surveillance data from 2001 through 2005. Cases were included if they involved exposure to at least one pyrethrin or pyrethroid insecticide. Descriptive statistics were calculated; differences between categories were assessed using Chi-square analysis.
A total of 407 cases fit our definition. Overall, the rate of poisoning in Oregon was significantly higher than in Washington (incidence rate ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.40, 2.07), and rates for both states generally increased during the time period. For both states, most exposures resulted in low severity illnesses (92%), and most were classified as possible cases (73%). Only about one-fourth of cases were related to a person's work. The most common category of clinical signs and symptoms of illness was respiratory (52% of cases), followed by neurological (40% of cases). Exposure route was predominantly inhalation; there was no association between route and case severity. There was a significant association between illness severity and losing time from work or regular activities (p<0.0001).
Although the majority of pyrethrin and pyrethroid poisoning cases were low in severity, adverse reactions have occurred, as transpired in Oregon in 2005. Regional analysis has the potential to improve the surveillance system and provide unique opportunities for targeting preventive interventions.
除虫菊酯和拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂常用于家庭、企业及一些农作物。本研究采用两州区域研究方法,分析因除虫菊酯和拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂导致的急性农药中毒报告。
华盛顿州卫生部和俄勒冈州公共卫生部门收集了2001年至2005年的农药中毒监测数据。若病例涉及至少一种除虫菊酯或拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂,则纳入研究。计算描述性统计数据;使用卡方分析评估类别之间的差异。
共有407例符合我们的定义。总体而言,俄勒冈州的中毒率显著高于华盛顿州(发病率比为1.70,95%置信区间为1.40至2.07),且两个州的中毒率在此期间总体呈上升趋势。对于两个州来说,大多数接触导致的是低严重程度疾病(92%),且大多数被归类为可能病例(73%)。只有约四分之一的病例与个人工作有关。疾病的临床体征和症状最常见的类别是呼吸系统(占病例的52%),其次是神经系统(占病例的40%)。接触途径主要是吸入;接触途径与病例严重程度之间无关联。疾病严重程度与误工或无法进行日常活动之间存在显著关联(p<0.0001)。
尽管大多数除虫菊酯和拟除虫菊酯中毒病例严重程度较低,但仍发生了不良反应,如2005年在俄勒冈州发生的情况。区域分析有潜力改进监测系统,并为针对性的预防干预提供独特机会。