De Fruyt Filip, De Bolle Marleen, McCrae Robert R, Terracciano Antonio, Costa Paul T
Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium.
Assessment. 2009 Sep;16(3):301-11. doi: 10.1177/1073191109333760. Epub 2009 May 5.
The structure and psychometric characteristics of the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), a more readable version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R), are examined and compared with NEO-PI-R characteristics using data from college student observer ratings of 5,109 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years from 24 cultures. Replacement items in the PI-3 showed on average stronger item-total correlations and slightly improved facet reliabilities compared with the NEO-PI-R in both English- and non-English-speaking samples. NEO-PI-3 replacement items did not substantially affect scale means compared with the original scales. Analyses across and within cultures confirmed the intended factor structure of both versions when used to describe young adolescents. The authors discuss implications of these cross-cultural findings for the advancement of studies in adolescence and personality development across the lifespan.
本研究使用来自24种文化背景下5109名12至17岁青少年的大学生观察者评分数据,对修订版大五人格量表(NEO-PI-R)的更易读版本——大五人格量表第3版(NEO-PI-3)的结构和心理测量学特征进行了检验,并与NEO-PI-R的特征进行了比较。在英语和非英语样本中,与NEO-PI-R相比,PI-3中的替换项目平均显示出更强的项目-总分相关性,且方面信度略有提高。与原始量表相比,NEO-PI-3替换项目对量表均值没有实质性影响。跨文化和文化内部的分析证实,两个版本在用于描述青少年时都具有预期的因子结构。作者讨论了这些跨文化研究结果对青少年研究及全生命周期人格发展研究进展的意义。