Suppr超能文献

主导地位何去何从?灵长类社会性的持久进化遗产。

Whither dominance? An enduring evolutionary legacy of primate sociality.

作者信息

Altschul Drew M

机构信息

The University of Edinburgh, UK.

Scottish Primate Research Group, UK.

出版信息

Personal Neurosci. 2024 Jan 8;7:e1. doi: 10.1017/pen.2023.13. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This article discusses dominance personality dimensions found in primates, particularly in the great apes, and how they compare to dominance in humans. Dominance traits are seen in virtually all primate species, and these dimensions reflect how adept an individual is at ascending within a social hierarchy. Among great apes, dominance is one of the most prominent personality factors but, in humans, dominance is usually modeled as a facet of extraversion. Social, cultural, and cognitive differences between humans and our closest ape relatives are explored, alongside humanity's hierarchical and egalitarian heritage. The basic characteristics of dominance in humans and nonhuman great apes are then described, alongside the similarities and differences between great apes. African apes live in societies each with its own hierarchical organization. Humans were a possible exception for some of our history, but more recently, hierarchies have dominated. The general characteristics of high-dominance humans, particularly those living in industrialized nations, are described. Dominance itself can be subdivided into correlated subfactors: domineering, prestige, and leadership. Various explanations have been posed for why dominance has declined in prominence within human personality factor structures, and several possibilities are evaluated. The value of dominance in personality research is discussed: dominance has links to, for instance, age, sex, aggression, self-esteem, locus of control, stress, health, and multiple socioeconomic status indicators. The piece concludes with recommendations for researchers who wish to assess dominance in personality.

摘要

本文讨论了在灵长类动物,特别是大猩猩中发现的支配型人格维度,以及它们与人类支配型人格的比较。几乎在所有灵长类物种中都能看到支配特征,这些维度反映了个体在社会等级制度中向上攀升的能力。在大猩猩中,支配是最突出的人格因素之一,但在人类中,支配通常被视为外向性的一个方面。本文探讨了人类与我们最亲近的猿类亲属之间的社会、文化和认知差异,以及人类的等级制度和平等主义传统。接着描述了人类和非人类大猩猩支配型人格的基本特征,以及大猩猩之间的异同。非洲猿类生活在各自具有等级组织的社会中。在人类历史的某些时期可能是个例外,但最近,等级制度占据了主导地位。文中描述了高支配型人类的一般特征,特别是那些生活在工业化国家的人。支配本身可以细分为相关的子因素:专横、威望和领导力。对于为什么支配在人类人格因素结构中的突出程度有所下降,人们提出了各种解释,并对几种可能性进行了评估。文中讨论了支配在人格研究中的价值:支配与年龄、性别、攻击性、自尊、控制点、压力、健康以及多个社会经济地位指标等有关。文章最后为希望评估人格中支配型人格的研究人员提供了建议。

相似文献

5
Dominance in humans.人类的统治地位。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 28;377(1845):20200451. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0451. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

3
Children's thinking about group-based social hierarchies.儿童对基于群体的社会等级制度的思考。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Jul;26(7):593-606. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 May 20.
5
The establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies.优势等级制度的建立和维持。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 28;377(1845):20200450. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0450. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验