• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格五因素模型在工作要求/资源与工作投入关系中的调节作用:一项在线横断面研究。

The Moderating Role of the Five-Factor Model of Personality in the Relationship between Job Demands/Resources and Work Engagement: An Online Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Fukuzaki Toshiki, Iwata Noboru

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.

Psychosocial Epidemiology, Graduate School of Nursing, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Japan.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 12;14(10):936. doi: 10.3390/bs14100936.

DOI:10.3390/bs14100936
PMID:39457808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11505521/
Abstract

When organizations or managers utilize personality assessments for their workers, it is crucial to consider not only personality profiles but also the interaction between these profiles and the psychosocial environmental factors in the workplace. The present study aimed to examine the moderating effects of the five-factor model (FFM) of personality traits on the relationship between job demands/resources and work engagement (WE). A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between November and December 2022, targeting full-time workers in Japan. Data were collected from 1500 participants (757 men and 743 women). The survey included demographic variables, job demands and resources (job control, supervisor, and coworker support), WE, and the FFM. The primary statistical analysis was hierarchical regression analysis, which tested the interactions between job demands/resources and each personality trait. Four significant interactions were found: job demands and neuroticism, control and neuroticism, control and conscientiousness, and supervisor support and extraversion. High conscientiousness was associated with higher WE when job control was abundant. Moreover, low levels of both neuroticism and extraversion were linked to higher WE. The results suggest that managers can enhance WE by aligning workplace factors with employee personality traits. These insights can be applied to organizational staffing decisions.

摘要

当组织或管理者为员工使用人格评估时,不仅要考虑人格概况,还要考虑这些概况与工作场所心理社会环境因素之间的相互作用,这一点至关重要。本研究旨在考察人格特质的五因素模型(FFM)对工作需求/资源与工作投入(WE)之间关系的调节作用。2022年11月至12月期间进行了一项横断面在线调查,目标是日本的全职员工。从1500名参与者(757名男性和743名女性)那里收集了数据。调查包括人口统计学变量、工作需求和资源(工作控制、上级和同事支持)、工作投入以及五因素模型。主要的统计分析是层次回归分析,该分析测试了工作需求/资源与每个人格特质之间的相互作用。发现了四个显著的相互作用:工作需求与神经质、控制与神经质、控制与尽责性以及上级支持与外向性。当工作控制充足时,高尽责性与更高的工作投入相关。此外,低神经质水平和低外向性水平都与更高的工作投入相关。结果表明,管理者可以通过使工作场所因素与员工人格特质相匹配来提高工作投入。这些见解可应用于组织人员配置决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/11505521/2acc77837fc6/behavsci-14-00936-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/11505521/97cd7cd0a7b2/behavsci-14-00936-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/11505521/2acc77837fc6/behavsci-14-00936-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/11505521/97cd7cd0a7b2/behavsci-14-00936-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/11505521/2acc77837fc6/behavsci-14-00936-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Moderating Role of the Five-Factor Model of Personality in the Relationship between Job Demands/Resources and Work Engagement: An Online Cross-Sectional Study.人格五因素模型在工作要求/资源与工作投入关系中的调节作用:一项在线横断面研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 12;14(10):936. doi: 10.3390/bs14100936.
2
Personality moderators of the cross-sectional relationship between job demands and both burnout and work engagement in judges: The boosting effects of conscientiousness and introversion.法官工作要求与职业倦怠和工作投入之间横断面关系的人格调节因素:尽责性和内向性的促进作用。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2023 Jul-Aug;89:101902. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101902. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
Associations between five-factor model traits and perceived job strain: a population-based study.五因素模型特质与感知到的工作压力之间的关联:一项基于人群的研究。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Oct;18(4):492-500. doi: 10.1037/a0033987.
4
The moderating role of decision authority and coworker- and supervisor support on the impact of job demands in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study.决策权威、同事支持和主管支持在工作需求对养老院影响中的调节作用:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jul;49(7):822-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 11.
5
A multilevel analysis of the role personality play between work organization conditions and psychological distress.工作组织条件与心理困扰之间人格作用的多层次分析。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;9(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00703-6.
6
The Relationship between Personality Traits, Work-Family Support and Job Satisfaction among Frontline Power Grid Workers.一线电网工人的人格特质、工作-家庭支持与工作满意度之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2637. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032637.
7
Is Work Time Control Good for Innovation? A Two-Stage Study to Verify the Mediating and Moderating Processes.工作时间控制对创新有益吗?一项验证中介和调节过程的两阶段研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 1;13:821441. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.821441. eCollection 2022.
8
Burnout is more strongly linked to neuroticism than to work-contextualized factors. burnout 与神经质的相关性比与工作环境因素的相关性更强。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:901-905. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
9
The Relationships among Proactive Personality, Work Engagement, and Perceived Work Competence in Sports Coaches: The Moderating Role of Perceived Supervisor Support.体育教练中主动性人格、工作投入和感知工作能力之间的关系:感知主管支持的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 4;19(19):12707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912707.
10
Association between the five-factor model of personality and work engagement: a meta-analysis.人格五因素模型与工作投入的关系:一项元分析。
Ind Health. 2022 Apr 1;60(2):154-163. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0051. Epub 2021 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of negative and positive affectivity on the relationship between work-related psychological factors and work engagement in Japanese workers: a comparison of psychological distress.负性和正性情感效应对工作相关心理因素与日本工作者工作投入关系的影响:心理困扰的比较。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 3;11(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01250-y.
2
Personality moderators of the cross-sectional relationship between job demands and both burnout and work engagement in judges: The boosting effects of conscientiousness and introversion.法官工作要求与职业倦怠和工作投入之间横断面关系的人格调节因素:尽责性和内向性的促进作用。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2023 Jul-Aug;89:101902. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101902. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
Crossover of Work Engagement: The Moderating Role of Agreeableness.
工作投入的交叉:宜人性的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;19(13):7622. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137622.
4
Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model.工作投入:运用工作要求-资源模型的元分析。
Psychol Rep. 2023 Jun;126(3):1069-1107. doi: 10.1177/00332941211051988. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
5
Association between the five-factor model of personality and work engagement: a meta-analysis.人格五因素模型与工作投入的关系:一项元分析。
Ind Health. 2022 Apr 1;60(2):154-163. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0051. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
6
Workaholism, Work Engagement and Child Well-Being: A Test of the Spillover-Crossover Model.工作狂、工作投入与儿童福祉:溢出-交叉模型的检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;17(17):6213. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176213.
7
How Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project.人格特质与重要生活结果之间的联系有多大程度的可复制性?人格特质复制项目的生活结果。
Psychol Sci. 2019 May;30(5):711-727. doi: 10.1177/0956797619831612. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
8
Do Personality Traits Determine Work Engagement? Results From a Belgian Study.人格特质是否决定工作投入?来自比利时的研究结果。
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jan;61(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001458.
9
Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions.构建工作投入度:一项关于工作投入干预效果的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Organ Behav. 2017 Jul;38(6):792-812. doi: 10.1002/job.2167. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
10
Personality Traits Moderate the Effect of Workload Sources on Perceived Workload in Flying Column Police Officers.人格特质调节飞行纵队警察工作负荷源对其工作负荷感知的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 27;6:1835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01835. eCollection 2015.