Suppr超能文献

癌症患者使用草药的情况:一项定性研究。

The use of herbal medicines by people with cancer: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Gratus Christine, Wilson Sue, Greenfield Sheila M, Damery Sarah L, Warmington Sally A, Grieve Robert, Steven Neil M, Routledge Philip

机构信息

Primary Care Clinical Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009 May 14;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-9-14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Between 7% and 48% of cancer patients report taking herbal medicines after diagnosis. Because of the possibility of unwanted side effects or interactions with conventional treatments, people with cancer are generally advised to tell the professionals treating them if they are taking any form of medication, including herbal medicines and supplements. Studies suggest that only about half do so and that the professionals themselves have at best very limited knowledge and feel unable to give informed advice. This study is intended to inform the future development of information resources for cancer patients, survivors and healthcare professionals including tools for use before or during consultation to make it easier for patients to mention, and for healthcare professionals to ask about, use of herbal medications.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a three-phase study. In phase 1, a systematic review of the literature on self-medication with herbal medicines among UK populations living with cancer will establish the current evidence base on use of herbal medicine, sources of information, characteristics and motivations. This will allow us to better understand what aspects need further investigation and inform the topic guide for a qualitative study (phase 2). Six focus groups of six to eight cancer patients who have used at least one herbal preparation since diagnosis will explore behaviour, beliefs, knowledge, information sources and needs in an informal conversational setting.Informed by the findings of the systematic review and qualitative study, in phase 3 we will construct and pilot a questionnaire for a future large-scale survey to quantify and prioritise people's beliefs, needs and information preferences.

DISCUSSION

Despite known interactions with conventional cancer treatments and contraindications for some herbal remedies with specific cancers, reliable information resources for patients are very limited. Identifying cancer patients' information needs and preferences is the first step in creating a suitable resource for both the public and the professionals advising them.

摘要

背景

7%至48%的癌症患者报告在确诊后服用草药。由于存在不良副作用或与传统治疗相互作用的可能性,通常建议癌症患者告知治疗他们的专业人员自己是否正在服用任何形式的药物,包括草药和补充剂。研究表明,只有约一半的患者会这样做,而且专业人员自身的相关知识非常有限,感觉无法提供明智的建议。本研究旨在为癌症患者、幸存者和医疗保健专业人员的信息资源未来发展提供依据,包括在咨询前或咨询期间使用的工具,以便患者更容易提及、医疗保健专业人员更容易询问草药的使用情况。

方法/设计:这是一项分三个阶段的研究。在第一阶段,对英国癌症患者自我用药的草药文献进行系统综述,将建立关于草药使用、信息来源、特征和动机的现有证据基础。这将使我们能够更好地理解哪些方面需要进一步研究,并为定性研究(第二阶段)的主题指南提供依据。六个焦点小组,每组由六至八名自确诊后至少使用过一种草药制剂的癌症患者组成,将在非正式对话环境中探讨行为、信念、知识、信息来源和需求。根据系统综述和定性研究的结果,在第三阶段,我们将构建并试用一份问卷,用于未来的大规模调查,以量化并确定人们的信念、需求和信息偏好的优先级。

讨论

尽管已知草药与传统癌症治疗存在相互作用,且某些草药对特定癌症有禁忌,但为患者提供的可靠信息资源非常有限。确定癌症患者的信息需求和偏好是为公众和为他们提供建议的专业人员创建合适资源的第一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b808/2685766/e1add6bdcc47/1472-6882-9-14-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验