Pian-Smith May C M, Simon Robert, Minehart Rebecca D, Podraza Marjorie, Rudolph Jenny, Walzer Toni, Raemer Daniel
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Simul Healthc. 2009 Summer;4(2):84-91. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31818cffd3.
Residents train in a historically hierarchical system. They may be compelled to question their teachers if they do not understand or disagree with a clinical decision, have a patient safety concern, or when treatment plans are unclear. We sought to determine whether a debriefing intervention that emphasizes (1) joint responsibility for safety and (2) the "two-challenge rule" (a rubric for challenging others) using a conversational technique that is assertive and collaborative (advocacy-inquiry) can improve the frequency and effectiveness with which residents "speak up" to superiors.
In a simulated operating room, anesthesiology trainees were presented with opportunities to challenge coworkers (eg, orders to administer a relatively contraindicated medication). Opportunities to challenge the attending faculty anesthesiologist, attending faculty surgeon, and nurse (all confederates) were presented. When debriefed, subjects were taught the two-challenge rule and a communication technique that paired advocacy (stating trainee's observation) and inquiry (request for the other's reasoning). A second scenario offered new opportunities to challenge. Video recorded scenarios were evaluated by two investigators and trainee use of the prescribed advocacy-inquiry language was rated on a 5-point scale.
Forty subjects participated. Overall use of the two-challenge rule and advocacy-inquiry increased after debriefing. The debriefing and instruction specifically improved the frequency and quality of challenges directed toward superordinate physicians, without improving resident challenges toward nurses.
This instructional intervention improves "speaking up" by residents to other physicians during simulated obstetric cases. Providing increased opportunities for resident learning, sharing responsibility for patient safety, and overcoming communication barriers within the medical hierarchy may improve teamwork and patient safety.
住院医师在一个历史悠久的等级制度体系中接受培训。如果他们不理解或不同意临床决策、存在患者安全问题,或者治疗计划不明确时,可能会被迫质疑他们的带教老师。我们试图确定一种汇报干预措施,该措施强调(1)对安全的共同责任,以及(2)使用自信且协作的对话技巧(支持性询问)的“双重挑战规则”(一种挑战他人的准则),是否能够提高住院医师向上级“直言”的频率和效果。
在模拟手术室中,为麻醉学实习生提供挑战同事的机会(例如,给予相对禁忌药物的医嘱)。提供了挑战麻醉科主治医生、外科主治医生和护士(均为协同者)的机会。在汇报时,向受试者传授双重挑战规则以及一种将支持(陈述实习生的观察结果)和询问(请求对方给出理由)相结合的沟通技巧。第二个场景提供了新的挑战机会。由两名研究人员对录像场景进行评估,并根据5分制对实习生使用规定的支持性询问语言的情况进行评分。
40名受试者参与了研究。汇报后,双重挑战规则和支持性询问的总体使用有所增加。汇报和指导特别提高了针对上级医生提出挑战的频率和质量,但并未提高住院医师对护士提出挑战的情况。
这种教学干预提高了住院医师在模拟产科病例中向其他医生“直言”的情况。为住院医师提供更多学习机会、分担患者安全责任以及克服医疗等级制度中的沟通障碍,可能会改善团队协作和患者安全。