• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎椎板成形术后活动度丧失的时间进程:一项至少随访两年的前瞻性研究。

The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up.

作者信息

Hyun Seung-Jae, Rhim Seung-Chul, Roh Sung-Woo, Kang Suk-Hyung, Riew K Daniel

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):1134-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c389b.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c389b
PMID:19444059
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the time-dependent change in range of motion (ROM) after cervical laminoplasty.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although numerous studies have reported on the loss of flexion/extension ROM associated with laminoplasty, few have reported on the time course of this loss of motion.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients who received unilateral open-door laminoplasties, including miniplate fixation over 2 levels, were serially evaluated at regular set intervals after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 26.78 months (range: 24-41 months). Twelve patients had OPLL and 11 patients had cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups (ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament [OPLL] and cervical spondylotic myelopathy) to compare the ROM between the OPLL and the spondylosis patients. We evaluated the time-dependent neck ROM changes by taking neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Postoperative neck and arm pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale.

RESULTS

The preoperative, and 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month postoperative ROM figures were 37.8 degrees +/- 14.6 degrees, 34.1 degrees +/- 12.9 degrees, 35.0 degrees +/- 12.3 degrees, 30.3 degrees +/- 13.0 degrees, 28.6 degrees +/- 15.1 degrees, 27.3 degrees +/- 12.4 degrees, 26.1 degrees +/- 14.8 degrees, and 25.9 degrees +/- 13.2 degrees, respectively, and at the most recent follow-up, ROM was 25.8 +/- 15.2 degrees. Thus, the mean ROM decreased by 10.1 degrees +/- 9.5 degrees (31.66%) after surgery (P = 0.002). In OPLL group, we observed a more limited cervical ROM than in cervical spondylotic myelopathy group (35.3% vs. 29.2%). However, the rate of ROM reduction slowed with time in both groups (P = 0.000). Postoperative axial pain did not correlate with the degree of serial cervical ROM.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the loss of cervical ROM is time-dependent and plateaus by 18 months after surgery, with no further decreases thereafter.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性研究。

目的

确定颈椎椎板成形术后活动范围(ROM)随时间的变化。

背景数据总结

尽管众多研究报告了与椎板成形术相关的屈伸ROM丧失情况,但很少有研究报告这种活动丧失的时间进程。

方法

对23例行单侧开门椎板成形术(包括2节段微型钢板固定)的患者在术后定期进行系列评估。平均随访期为26.78个月(范围:24 - 41个月)。12例患者患有后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL),11例患者患有脊髓型颈椎病。将纳入的患者分为2组(后纵韧带骨化症[OPLL]组和脊髓型颈椎病组)以比较OPLL组和颈椎病患者之间的ROM。我们通过在术前以及术后1、3、6、9、12、18和24个月拍摄中立位、屈曲位和伸展位X线片来评估随时间变化的颈部ROM改变。使用数字评分量表评估术后颈部和手臂疼痛。

结果

术前以及术后1、3、6、9、12、18和24个月的ROM数值分别为37.8°±14.6°、34.1°±12.9°、35.0°±12.3°、30.3°±13.0°、28.6°±15.1°、27.3°±12.4°、26.1°±14.8°和25.9°±13.2°,在最近一次随访时,ROM为25.8±15.2°。因此,术后平均ROM下降了10.1°±9.5°(31.66%)(P = 0.002)。在OPLL组中,我们观察到颈椎ROM比脊髓型颈椎病组更受限(35.3%对29.2%)。然而,两组中ROM降低的速率均随时间减慢(P = 0.000)。术后轴性疼痛与系列颈椎ROM程度无关。

结论

结果表明颈椎ROM的丧失是时间依赖性的,术后18个月达到平台期,此后不再进一步下降。

相似文献

1
The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up.颈椎椎板成形术后活动度丧失的时间进程:一项至少随访两年的前瞻性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):1134-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c389b.
2
Range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum 5-year follow-up data.颈椎板切除术术后活动范围丧失:一项前瞻性研究,随访时间至少为 5 年。
Spine J. 2013 Apr;13(4):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.037. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
3
Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.颈椎管狭窄症的椎板成形术和跳跃式椎板切除术:一项随机前瞻性研究中的活动范围、术后颈部疼痛及手术效果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 15;32(18):1980-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133fbce.
4
Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty?接受钢板固定联合椎板成形术治疗的后纵韧带骨化症患者与颈椎病患者在活动范围、颈部疼痛和预后方面是否存在差异?
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(1):E9. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.FOCUS1394.
5
Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.椎板成形术后颈椎矢状位排列。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 1;32(23):E656-60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158c573.
6
Long-term results of tension-band laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: a ten-year follow-up.颈椎管狭窄性脊髓病张力带椎板成形术的长期结果:十年随访
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jan;93(1):68-72. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24532.
7
Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.扩大开门式颈椎管成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的长期疗效——平均14年随访研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):2998-3005. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250307.78987.6b.
8
Neck muscle strength before and after cervical laminoplasty: relation to axial symptoms.颈椎板成形术前和术后颈部肌肉力量:与轴性症状的关系。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 May;23(3):197-202. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a1a73e.
9
Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty.跳跃式椎板切除术的结果——与开门式椎板成形术对比的至少2年随访研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 15;28(24):2667-72. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000103340.78418.B2.
10
An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.后纵韧带骨化所致脊髓型颈椎病患者手术效果不佳的相关因素分析:前路减压植骨融合术与椎板成形术的比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Feb;20(1):7-13. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211260.28497.35.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of physiotherapy and rehabilitation after cervical spinal surgery: a systematic review.颈椎手术后物理治疗与康复的有效性:一项系统综述
Eur Spine J. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08814-z.
2
A stacking ensemble machine learning model for predicting postoperative axial pain intensity in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.一种用于预测退行性颈椎脊髓病患者术后轴向疼痛强度的堆叠集成机器学习模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94755-y.
3
Axial Neck Pain after Cervical Laminoplasty with Preserving C7 Spinous Process Using C7 Arcocristectomy: A Prospective Study.
保留C7棘突的C7椎板切除成形术治疗轴性颈痛的前瞻性研究:使用C7椎弓根嵴切除术。
Asian Spine J. 2023 Oct;17(5):826-834. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0433. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
A Novel Method of Making Hinges Using a Newly Designed Sharp Rongeur to Enhance Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in French-Door Cervical Expansive Laminoplasty.一种使用新型锐性咬骨钳制作铰链的新方法,可提高法式门颈椎扩张式椎管成形术的放射学和临床效果。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3349-3357. doi: 10.1111/os.13505. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
Relationship Between C2 Semispinalis Cervicis Preservation and C2 Spinous Process Morphology During Cervical Laminoplasty Involving C3.涉及C3的颈椎椎板成形术中C2颈半棘肌保留与C2棘突形态的关系
Global Spine J. 2023 Sep;13(7):1938-1945. doi: 10.1177/21925682211062496. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
6
The Relative Merits of Posterior Surgical Treatments for Multi-Level Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Remain Uncertain: Findings from a Systematic Review.多节段退行性颈椎脊髓病后路手术治疗的相对优势仍不确定:一项系统评价的结果
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 18;10(16):3653. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163653.
7
Laminoplasty with selective fusion at unstable segment versus laminectomy with fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a case-control study.选择性融合不稳定节段椎板成形术与多节段颈椎脊髓病椎板切除术加融合术的对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 May 7;22(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04297-3.
8
Comparative Five-Year Surgical Outcomes of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病经单开门与双开门椎管扩大成形术的 5 年手术疗效比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 7;2020:8853733. doi: 10.1155/2020/8853733. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparison of clinical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty with unilateral or bilateral fixation and fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a multi-center prospective study.单侧或双侧固定融合的扩大开门式椎板成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较:一项多中心前瞻性研究
BMC Surg. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0583-8.
10
Cervical rotation before and after hinge-door cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.颈椎管狭窄症行铰链式颈椎椎板成形术前及术后的颈椎旋转情况
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):114-118. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_25_19.