• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎板切除术术后活动范围丧失:一项前瞻性研究,随访时间至少为 5 年。

Range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum 5-year follow-up data.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Spine J. 2013 Apr;13(4):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.037. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.037
PMID:23218824
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although numerous studies have reported on the loss of flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) associated with laminoplasty, few have reported on the time course of this loss of motion for a long-term follow-up period.

PURPOSE

We previously reported our early data on postlaminoplasty cervical ROM. In this article, we describe our minimum 5-year follow-up data to identify the time-dependent change in ROM after cervical laminoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The procedure was performed in 23 patients. Eighteen patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The time-dependent neck ROM changes observed in the neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs were used to measure the radiological outcome. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association classification and a numerical rating scale of axial neck pain and arm pain were used to evaluate clinical outcome.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients who received unilateral open-door laminoplasties, including miniplate fixation over three levels, were serially evaluated at regular set intervals postoperatively. Eighteen patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 68.1 months (range, 60-78 months). Nine patients had ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and nine patients had cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Enrolled patients were divided into subgroups (OPLL vs. CSM; autofusion vs. nonautofusion) to compare the ROM between the groups. We evaluated the time-dependent neck ROM changes by taking neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Follow-up radiographs were taken annually after a 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The preoperative and 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48-, and 60-month postoperative ROM figures were 39.9 ± 11.2°, 35.0 ± 9.2°, 33.0 ± 11.0°, 30.1 ± 10.4°, 25.8 ± 13.1°, 24.7 ± 10.0°, 23.8 ± 6.5°, 24.6 ± 8.3°, and 23.6 ± 9.4°, respectively, and at the most recent follow-up, ROM was 24.5 ± 10.1°. Thus, the mean ROM decreased by 15.4 ± 8.4° (38.5%) by the last follow-up (p<.0001). In the OPLL group, we observed a more limited cervical ROM than in the CSM group (47.2% vs. 72.7%). As expected, in the laminar autofusion group, the ROM decreased significantly (55.6% decrease), whereas in the nonautofusion group, the ROM decreased less significantly (13.4% decrease) at the last follow-up. Postoperative axial pain did not correlate with the cervical ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the loss of cervical ROM after laminoplasty is time-dependent, and patients with OPLL and laminar autofusion had less ROM. Postlaminoplasty ROM reduction can recover after several years, unless laminar autofusion occurs.

摘要

背景情况

虽然有许多研究报告了与椎板成形术相关的屈伸范围(ROM)丧失,但很少有研究报告长期随访期间这种运动丧失的时间过程。

目的

我们之前报告了椎板成形术后颈椎 ROM 的早期数据。在本文中,我们描述了我们至少 5 年的随访数据,以确定椎板成形术后 ROM 的时间依赖性变化。

研究设计

前瞻性队列研究。

患者样本

该手术在 23 名患者中进行。18 名至少随访 5 年的患者纳入研究。

结果测量

使用中立位、前屈和伸展位 X 线片观察到的颈部 ROM 随时间的变化来测量放射学结果。日本矫形协会分类和轴向颈部疼痛和手臂疼痛的数字评分量表用于评估临床结果。

方法

23 名接受单侧开门椎板成形术的患者,包括在三个水平以上进行微型板固定,术后在固定间隔时间内进行连续评估。18 名至少随访 5 年的患者纳入研究。平均随访时间为 68.1 个月(范围 60-78 个月)。9 名患者有后纵韧带骨化(OPLL),9 名患者有颈椎脊髓病(CSM)。纳入的患者分为亚组(OPLL 与 CSM;自动融合与非自动融合),以比较组间的 ROM。我们通过在术前和术后 1、3、6、9、12、18 和 24 个月拍摄中立位、前屈位和伸展位 X 线片来评估颈部 ROM 随时间的变化。2 年随访后,每年进行一次随访 X 线片。

结论

术前和术后 1、3、6、12、24、36、48 和 60 个月的 ROM 分别为 39.9±11.2°、35.0±9.2°、33.0±11.0°、30.1±10.4°、25.8±13.1°、24.7±10.0°、23.8±6.5°、24.6±8.3°和 23.6±9.4°,而在最近一次随访时,ROM 为 24.5±10.1°。因此,最后随访时平均 ROM 减少了 15.4±8.4°(38.5%)(p<.0001)。在 OPLL 组中,我们观察到比 CSM 组更有限的颈椎 ROM(47.2%比 72.7%)。正如预期的那样,在层板自动融合组中,ROM 明显下降(下降 55.6%),而在非自动融合组中,ROM 下降幅度较小(下降 13.4%)。术后轴向疼痛与颈椎 ROM 无关。

这些结果表明,椎板成形术后颈椎 ROM 的丧失是时间依赖性的,OPLL 患者和层板自动融合患者的 ROM 较小。除非发生层板自动融合,否则椎板成形术后 ROM 的减少可以在几年后恢复。

相似文献

1
Range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum 5-year follow-up data.颈椎板切除术术后活动范围丧失:一项前瞻性研究,随访时间至少为 5 年。
Spine J. 2013 Apr;13(4):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.037. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
2
The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up.颈椎椎板成形术后活动度丧失的时间进程:一项至少随访两年的前瞻性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):1134-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c389b.
3
Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty?接受钢板固定联合椎板成形术治疗的后纵韧带骨化症患者与颈椎病患者在活动范围、颈部疼痛和预后方面是否存在差异?
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(1):E9. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.FOCUS1394.
4
Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.颈椎管狭窄症的椎板成形术和跳跃式椎板切除术:一项随机前瞻性研究中的活动范围、术后颈部疼痛及手术效果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 15;32(18):1980-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133fbce.
5
Postlaminoplasty cervical range of motion: early results.椎板成形术后颈椎活动范围:早期结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 May;6(5):386-90. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.5.386.
6
Long-term results of tension-band laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: a ten-year follow-up.颈椎管狭窄性脊髓病张力带椎板成形术的长期结果:十年随访
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jan;93(1):68-72. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24532.
7
The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.动态因素对颈椎后纵韧带骨化症双开门椎板成形术后手术效果的影响
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):938-43. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE131197. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
8
Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.扩大开门式颈椎管成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的长期疗效——平均14年随访研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):2998-3005. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250307.78987.6b.
9
Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion.后纵韧带骨化症患者术后颈椎三维活动度及神经功能结果:颈椎椎板成形术与椎板切除融合术的比较
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Jul;134:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
10
Impact of Cervical Sagittal Alignment on Axial Neck Pain and Health-related Quality of Life After Cervical Laminoplasty in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy or Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Comparative Study.颈椎矢状面排列对脊髓型颈椎病或后纵韧带骨化症患者颈椎椎板成形术后轴性颈部疼痛及健康相关生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 May;31(4):E245-E251. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000619.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Body Mass Index and Metabolic Syndrome on Perioperative Outcomes Following Cervical Laminoplasty.体重指数和代谢综合征对颈椎椎板成形术后围手术期结局的影响。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 6:21925682251349993. doi: 10.1177/21925682251349993.
2
The impact of nuchal ligament ossification resection on cervical stability after modified laminoplasty: a long-term follow-up study.改良椎板成形术后项韧带骨化切除术对颈椎稳定性的影响:一项长期随访研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 24;26(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08729-2.
3
Effects of Preoperative Cervical Range of Motion on Clinical Outcomes Following Posterior Decompression: A Multicenter Study of Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
术前颈椎活动度对后路减压术后临床疗效的影响:一项关于后纵韧带骨化症患者的多中心研究
Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):2255-2264. doi: 10.1177/21925682241296456. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
4
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Intermuscular "Raising Roof" Modified Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of at Least 2 Years Follow-Up.肌间隙“抬顶”改良颈椎椎板成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床及影像学结果:一项至少随访2年的回顾性研究
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr 1:21925682251333285. doi: 10.1177/21925682251333285.
5
Prevalence and distribution of cervical facet joint degeneration in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy without/with instability and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament-a comparative study.无/伴有后纵韧带骨化及不稳定的脊髓型颈椎病患者颈椎小关节退变的患病率及分布——一项对比研究
Eur Spine J. 2025 Apr;34(4):1229-1237. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08761-9. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
6
Preoperative Factors on Loss of Range of Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.颈椎后路椎间孔切开术后活动范围丧失的术前因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 13;60(9):1496. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091496.
7
Spontaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion Following Posterolateral Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 5-Year Data.后外侧融合手术后的自发性腰椎椎间融合:一项5年数据的回顾性分析
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Apr 18;58(5):598-605. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01148-w. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Axial Neck Pain after Cervical Laminoplasty with Preserving C7 Spinous Process Using C7 Arcocristectomy: A Prospective Study.保留C7棘突的C7椎板切除成形术治疗轴性颈痛的前瞻性研究:使用C7椎弓根嵴切除术。
Asian Spine J. 2023 Oct;17(5):826-834. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0433. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
9
A Novel Method of Making Hinges Using a Newly Designed Sharp Rongeur to Enhance Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in French-Door Cervical Expansive Laminoplasty.一种使用新型锐性咬骨钳制作铰链的新方法,可提高法式门颈椎扩张式椎管成形术的放射学和临床效果。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3349-3357. doi: 10.1111/os.13505. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
10
Instrumented fusion versus instrumented non-fusion following expansive open-door laminoplasty for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.经单开门椎管扩大成形术后,多节段颈椎后纵韧带骨化采用内固定融合与非融合的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):2919-2927. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04498-y. Epub 2022 Jun 9.