The University Clinical Center Tuzla, Trnovac bb, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2770-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0487-2. Epub 2009 May 15.
To evaluate if percutaneous drainage of sterile fluid collections recurring after initial aspiration in acute pancreatitis yields better results than their conservative management.
Fifty-eight patients with fluid collections in acute pancreatitis were followed up prospectively. Forty of them with sterile fluid collections that recurred after initial aspiration were randomly assigned to two groups of 20 in each. One group was initially treated with conservative management and the other group with prolonged catheter drainage. Patients with unsuccessful initial treatment were converted to more aggressive procedure. Outcome measure was conversion rate to more aggressive procedure.
Conversion to more aggressive procedure was done in 11 and 3 patients treated conservatively and with catheter drainage, respectively (p = 0.02). Four and 11 patients had bacterial colonization of their fluid collections in conservative management and drainage group, respectively (p = 0.048). Conservative treatment was successful in all six patients with sterile liquid collections < 30 ml. However, this treatment was unsuccessful in all seven patients with multiloculated and liquid collections >100 ml.
Prolonged catheter drainage is more efficient for management of recurrent sterile fluid collections in acute pancreatitis than is conservative treatment. Conservative treatment is successful for patients with small fluid collections.
评估在急性胰腺炎初始抽吸后无菌性积液复发时进行经皮引流是否比保守治疗效果更好。
前瞻性随访 58 例急性胰腺炎伴积液的患者。其中 40 例无菌性积液在初始抽吸后复发,随机分为两组,每组 20 例。一组最初采用保守治疗,另一组采用延长导管引流。对初始治疗不成功的患者进行更积极的治疗。观察指标为转为更积极治疗的转化率。
分别有 11 例和 3 例接受保守治疗和导管引流的患者转为更积极的治疗(p = 0.02)。保守治疗组和引流组分别有 4 例和 11 例患者的积液发生细菌定植(p = 0.048)。在所有 6 例积液量<30ml 的无菌性液体患者中,保守治疗均成功。然而,在所有 7 例多房性和积液量>100ml 的患者中,保守治疗均不成功。
与保守治疗相比,延长导管引流更有效地治疗急性胰腺炎复发性无菌性积液。对于小的积液量患者,保守治疗是成功的。