Hobday Richard A, Cason John W
Department of Architectural Studies, University of Wales Institute, Cardiff, Llandaff Campus, Western Avenue, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, United Kingdom.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Oct;99 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S236-42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.134627. Epub 2009 May 21.
The H1N1 "Spanish flu" outbreak of 1918-1919 was the most devastating pandemic on record, killing between 50 million and 100 million people. Should the next influenza pandemic prove equally virulent, there could be more than 300 million deaths globally. The conventional view is that little could have been done to prevent the H1N1 virus from spreading or to treat those infected; however, there is evidence to the contrary. Records from an "open-air" hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, suggest that some patients and staff were spared the worst of the outbreak. A combination of fresh air, sunlight, scrupulous standards of hygiene, and reusable face masks appears to have substantially reduced deaths among some patients and infections among medical staff. We argue that temporary hospitals should be a priority in emergency planning. Equally, other measures adopted during the 1918 pandemic merit more attention than they currently receive.
1918年至1919年爆发的H1N1“西班牙流感”是有史以来最具毁灭性的大流行病,造成了5000万至1亿人死亡。如果下一次流感大流行同样具有高传染性,全球死亡人数可能会超过3亿。传统观点认为,几乎无法采取措施阻止H1N1病毒传播或治疗感染者;然而,有相反的证据。马萨诸塞州波士顿一家“露天”医院的记录表明,一些患者和工作人员在疫情中幸免于最严重的情况。新鲜空气、阳光、严格的卫生标准和可重复使用的口罩相结合,似乎大幅减少了一些患者的死亡人数和医护人员的感染情况。我们认为,临时医院应成为应急规划的优先事项。同样,1918年大流行期间采取的其他措施应得到比目前更多的关注。