Kuikka Paavo-Ilari, Böstman Ole M, Kiuru Martti J, Salminen Sari T, Mikkola Sakari, Pihlajamäki Harri K
Centre for Military Medicine, P.O. Box 50, FIN-00301 Helsinki, Finland.
Open Orthop J. 2008 Feb 15;2:19-22. doi: 10.2174/1874325000802010019.
This prospective study aimed to evaluate if chondral and meniscal lesions in symptomatic knees of osteoarthritis patients can be reliably identified using only one sagittal dual-echo MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) sequence. MRI was performed on 13 patients after knee arthroscopy due to knee pain and clinically suspected osteoarthritis using a 1.5-Tesla scanner with knee coil and a sagittal dual-echo turbo spin-echo PD (Proton Density)- and T2-weighted sequence. The MRI and arthroscopic findings were then compared. Of 65 articular surfaces, 47 were damaged. For articular cartilage lesions, the overall sensitivity of MRI was 46.8%, specificity 72.2%, and diagnostic accuracy 53.9%, and for meniscal ruptures 81.2%, 66.7%, and 73.1%, respectively. The present study showed that the reliability of screening MRI of knees using only one sagittal dual-echo sequence does not suffice for diagnosis of chondral or meniscal lesions, and should therefore not replace routine knee MRI or diagnostic arthroscopy.
这项前瞻性研究旨在评估仅使用一个矢状面双回波磁共振成像(MRI)序列能否可靠地识别骨关节炎患者有症状膝关节中的软骨和半月板损伤。对13例因膝关节疼痛且临床怀疑患有骨关节炎而接受膝关节镜检查的患者,使用配备膝关节线圈的1.5特斯拉扫描仪及矢状面双回波快速自旋回波质子密度加权和T2加权序列进行MRI检查。然后将MRI和关节镜检查结果进行比较。在65个关节表面中,47个受损。对于关节软骨损伤,MRI的总体敏感性为46.8%,特异性为72.2%,诊断准确性为53.9%;对于半月板破裂,分别为81.2%、66.7%和73.1%。本研究表明,仅使用一个矢状面双回波序列进行膝关节MRI筛查的可靠性不足以诊断软骨或半月板损伤,因此不应取代常规膝关节MRI或诊断性关节镜检查。