Sports Health and Performance Institute and Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1557-68. doi: 10.1177/0363546511407612.
Current diagnostic strategies for detection of structural articular cartilage abnormalities, the earliest structural signs of osteoarthritis, often do not capture the condition until it is too far advanced for the most potential benefit of noninvasive interventions.
To systematically review the literature relative to the following questions: (1) Is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) a valid, sensitive, specific, accurate, and reliable instrument to identify knee articular cartilage abnormalities compared with arthroscopy? (2) Is MRI a sensitive tool that can be utilized to identify early cartilage degeneration?
Systematic review.
A systematic search was performed in November 2010 using PubMed MEDLINE (from 1966), CINAHL (from 1982), SPORTDiscus (from 1985), SCOPUS (from 1996), and EMBASE (from 1974) databases.
Fourteen level I and 13 level II studies were identified that met inclusion criteria and provided information related to diagnostic performance of MRI compared with arthroscopic evaluation. The diagnostic performance of MRI demonstrated a large range of sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies. The sensitivity for identifying articular cartilage abnormalities in the knee joint was reported between 26% and 96%. Specificity and accuracy were reported between 50% and 100% and between 49% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identifying early osteoarthritis were reported between 0% and 86%, 48% and 95%, and 5% and 94%, respectively. As a result of inconsistencies between imaging techniques and methodological shortcomings of many of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed, and it was difficult to fully synthesize the information to state firm conclusions about the diagnostic performance of MRI.
There is evidence in some MRI protocols that MRI is a relatively valid, sensitive, specific, accurate, and reliable clinical tool for identifying articular cartilage degeneration. Because of heterogeneity of MRI sequences, it is not possible to make definitive conclusions regarding its global clinical utility for guiding diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Traumatic sports injuries to the knee may be significant precursor events to early onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Magnetic resonance imaging may aid in early identification of structural injuries to articular cartilage as evidenced by articular cartilage degeneration grading.
目前用于检测结构关节软骨异常(骨关节炎最早的结构征象)的诊断策略,通常在最有可能通过非侵入性干预获益之前,关节软骨异常已经发展到非常严重的程度。
系统回顾文献,回答以下问题:(1)与关节镜相比,磁共振成像(MRI)是否为一种有效的、敏感的、特异的、准确的和可靠的检测膝关节关节软骨异常的手段?(2)MRI 是否为一种敏感的工具,可以用于检测早期软骨退变?
系统综述。
于 2010 年 11 月,通过检索 PubMed MEDLINE(从 1966 年起)、CINAHL(从 1982 年起)、SPORTDiscus(从 1985 年起)、SCOPUS(从 1996 年起)和 EMBASE(从 1974 年起)数据库,进行了系统性检索。
共纳入 14 项Ⅰ级研究和 13 项Ⅱ级研究,这些研究符合纳入标准,提供了与 MRI 相对于关节镜检查的诊断性能相关的信息。MRI 的诊断性能表现出较大的敏感度、特异度和准确度范围。膝关节关节软骨异常的检出敏感度报道为 26%96%。特异度和准确度分别报道为 50%100%和 49%94%。检测早期骨关节炎的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别报道为 0%86%、48%95%和 5%94%。由于成像技术之间存在差异,且许多研究存在方法学缺陷,因此无法进行荟萃分析,难以全面综合信息,从而对 MRI 的诊断性能做出明确结论。
一些 MRI 方案中有证据表明,MRI 是一种相对有效的、敏感的、特异的、准确的和可靠的临床工具,可用于检测关节软骨退变。由于 MRI 序列的异质性,无法确定其在指导诊断和治疗策略方面的整体临床应用价值。
膝关节创伤性运动损伤可能是早期创伤后骨关节炎发生的重要前兆事件。磁共振成像(MRI)可辅助早期发现关节软骨的结构损伤,表现为关节软骨退变分级。