National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May;2(5):384-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.01.009.
We evaluated demographic, clinical, and angiographic factors influencing the selection of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) in the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes) trial.
Factors guiding selection of mode of revascularization for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel CAD are not clearly defined.
In the BARI 2D trial, the selected revascularization strategy, CABG or PCI, was based on physician discretion, declared independent of randomization to either immediate or deferred revascularization if clinically warranted. We analyzed factors favoring selection of CABG versus PCI in 1,593 diabetic patients with multivessel CAD enrolled between 2001 and 2005.
Selection of CABG over PCI was declared in 44% of patients and was driven by angiographic factors including triple vessel disease (odds ratio [OR]: 4.43), left anterior descending stenosis >or=70% (OR: 2.86), proximal left anterior descending stenosis >or=50% (OR: 1.78), total occlusion (OR: 2.35), and multiple class C lesions (OR: 2.06) (all p < 0.005). Nonangiographic predictors of CABG included age >or=65 years (OR: 1.43, p = 0.011) and non-U.S. region (OR: 2.89, p = 0.017). Absence of prior PCI (OR: 0.45, p < 0.001) and the availability of drug-eluting stents conferred a lower probability of choosing CABG (OR: 0.60, p = 0.003).
The majority of diabetic patients with multivessel disease were selected for PCI rather than CABG. Preference for CABG over PCI was largely based on angiographic features related to the extent, location, and nature of CAD, as well as geographic, demographic, and clinical factors. (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes [BARI 2D]; NCT00006305).
我们评估了影响糖尿病多支血管病变患者选择冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的人口统计学、临床和血管造影因素。在 BARI 2D(2 型糖尿病旁路血管成形术再血管化研究)试验中。
指导糖尿病合并多支血管 CAD 患者血运重建方式选择的因素尚不清楚。
在 BARI 2D 试验中,CABG 或 PCI 的选择策略是根据医生的判断,在临床需要时,独立于随机分组选择即刻或延迟血运重建。我们分析了 2001 年至 2005 年间入选的 1593 例糖尿病多支血管 CAD 患者中有利于选择 CABG 与 PCI 的因素。
44%的患者选择了 CABG 而非 PCI,这主要与血管造影因素有关,包括三支血管病变(优势比[OR]:4.43)、左前降支狭窄>或=70%(OR:2.86)、左前降支近端狭窄>或=50%(OR:1.78)、完全闭塞(OR:2.35)和多支 C 类病变(OR:2.06)(均 P < 0.005)。CABG 的非血管造影预测因素包括年龄>或=65 岁(OR:1.43,P = 0.011)和非美国地区(OR:2.89,P = 0.017)。无先前 PCI(OR:0.45,P < 0.001)和药物洗脱支架的可用性降低了选择 CABG 的可能性(OR:0.60,P = 0.003)。
大多数多血管病变的糖尿病患者被选择进行 PCI 而不是 CABG。CABG 优于 PCI 的选择主要基于与 CAD 的范围、位置和性质以及地理、人口统计学和临床因素相关的血管造影特征。(2 型糖尿病旁路血管成形术再血管化研究[BARI 2D];NCT00006305)。