• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于检验双向列联表中独立性的单自由度名义关联模型。

A one degree of freedom nominal association model for testing independence in two-way contingency tables.

作者信息

Davis C S

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1991 Oct;10(10):1555-63. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101007.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780101007
PMID:1947511
Abstract

In testing the independence of the row and column variables in a two-way contingency table, the standard Pearson and likelihood ratio chi-square statistics often have low power, especially as the dimensions of the table increase. In this paper, one degree of freedom tests of independence based on likelihood ratio and score statistics from an association model for tables with nominal row and column classifications are described. The score statistic is especially easy to use, since it can be expressed in closed form, is simple to compute, and has size and power properties which are only slightly inferior to those of the more complicated likelihood ratio statistic.

摘要

在检验双向列联表中行变量和列变量的独立性时,标准的皮尔逊卡方统计量和似然比卡方统计量通常功效较低,尤其是随着表格维度的增加。本文描述了基于具有名义行分类和列分类的表格关联模型的似然比和得分统计量的单自由度独立性检验。得分统计量特别易于使用,因为它可以以封闭形式表示,计算简单,并且其大小和功效属性仅略逊于更复杂的似然比统计量。

相似文献

1
A one degree of freedom nominal association model for testing independence in two-way contingency tables.一种用于检验双向列联表中独立性的单自由度名义关联模型。
Stat Med. 1991 Oct;10(10):1555-63. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101007.
2
The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.具有缺失数据的RxC列联表中独立性的计分检验。
Biometrics. 1996 Jun;52(2):751-62.
3
Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.使用标准、中间p值和随机化检验版本对2×2列联表中的关联性进行双侧精确检验的功效比较。
Stat Med. 2003 Dec 30;22(24):3859-71. doi: 10.1002/sim.1671.
4
A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.对列联表和独立性检验的再探讨:相比于卡方近似法以及费舍尔精确检验,自助法更受青睐。
J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(3):438-58. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.920851.
5
Testing for independence in J×K contingency tables with complex sample survey data.使用复杂样本调查数据对J×K列联表进行独立性检验。
Biometrics. 2015 Sep;71(3):832-40. doi: 10.1111/biom.12297. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
6
Computation of the quasi-independence model for the analysis of triangular contingency tables.用于三角列联表分析的拟独立模型的计算。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008 Jan;89(1):72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.10.005. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
7
Multiway contingency tables: Monte Carlo resampling probability values for the chi-squared and likelihood-ratio tests.多维列联表:卡方检验和似然比检验的蒙特卡罗重采样概率值
Psychol Rep. 2010 Oct;107(2):501-10. doi: 10.2466/03.PR0.107.5.501-510.
8
A discussion on significance indices for contingency tables under small sample sizes.小样本量条件下列联表的意义指标探讨。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 2;13(8):e0199102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199102. eCollection 2018.
9
Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?卡方检验:它们在医学研究数据分析中有多大用处?
Ann Ig. 1989 May-Aug;1(3-4):417-32.
10
The analysis of 2 x 1 and 2 x 2 contingency tables: an historical review.2×1和2×2列联表分析:历史回顾
Stat Methods Med Res. 1994;3(2):107-33. doi: 10.1177/096228029400300202.