Fonseca Neuber Martins, Mandim Beatriz Lemos da S, Amorim Célio Gomes de
CET, SBA, FM, UFU.
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2002 Sep;52(5):549-61.
Patients undergoing thoracotomy experience severe postoperative pain. This study aimed at evaluating postoperative analgesia with the association of intravenous and epidural morphine as compared to a single route.
Participated in this study 20 patients of both genders, physical status ASA I, II or III, scheduled for thoracotomy. Patients were premedicated with intravenous midazolam (3 to 3.5 mg) in the OR. Monitoring consisted of continuous ECG, invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, capnography, CVP, diuresis and temperature. Continuous epidural anesthesia was induced in T7-T8 with 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine followed by fentanyl (5 microg.kg-1), etomidate(0.2 to 0.3 mg.kg-1) and succinylcholine (1 mg.kg-1). Tracheal intubation was performed with a double lumen tube and complemented with pancuronium(0.08 to 0.1 mg.kg-1) and mechanically controlled ventilation. Patients were then randomly distributed in three groups. Group I received 2 mg of 0.1% morphine by epidural catheter at anesthetic induction (M1), 12 h (M2) and 24 h (M3) after surgery. Group II received intravenous morphine by infusion pump (15 microg.kg.h-1) preceded by a 50 microg.kg-1 bolus, for 30 hours. Group III received 0.5 mg epidural morphine in M1, M2 and M3, associated to intravenous morphine by infusion pump (8 microg.kg.h-1), preceded by a 25 microg.kg-1 bolus, for 30 hours. Blood gas analysis, heart and respiratory rate, incidence of pruritus, nausea, vomiting and postoperative analgesia were evaluated at 6-hour intervals for 30 postoperative hours. Analgesia was evaluated by a numeric gradual scale (NGS) from 0 to 10.
NGS was lower in Group I in M2, without differences in remaining intervals. Pain decreased in Groups II and III as from 18 hours as compared to baseline and to Group I. Group I needed more additional analgesia as compared to other groups.
There has been a better analgesic effect with intravenous morphine or the association of intravenous and epidural morphine, with lower drug doses. This difference was significant when lower analgesic doses were used in these groups and represented an effective postoperative analgesic method for thoracotomy, with lower respiratory depression and emetic effects.
接受开胸手术的患者术后会经历严重疼痛。本研究旨在评估静脉注射与硬膜外注射吗啡联合使用与单一给药途径相比的术后镇痛效果。
20例计划行开胸手术的患者参与本研究,男女不限,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级为I、II或III级。患者在手术室接受静脉注射咪达唑仑(3至3.5毫克)进行术前用药。监测包括连续心电图、有创血压、脉搏血氧饱和度、二氧化碳监测、中心静脉压、尿量及体温。在T7 - T8间隙注入10毫升0.25%布比卡因诱导连续硬膜外麻醉,随后给予芬太尼(5微克/千克)、依托咪酯(0.2至0.3毫克/千克)和琥珀酰胆碱(1毫克/千克)。使用双腔气管导管进行气管插管,并补充潘库溴铵(0.08至0.1毫克/千克)及机械控制通气。患者随后随机分为三组。第一组在麻醉诱导时(M1)、术后12小时(M2)和24小时(M3)通过硬膜外导管给予2毫克0.1%吗啡。第二组通过输液泵静脉注射吗啡(15微克/千克·小时),先给予50微克/千克的负荷剂量,持续30小时。第三组在M1、M2和M3时给予0.5毫克硬膜外吗啡,并通过输液泵静脉注射吗啡(8微克/千克·小时),先给予25微克/千克的负荷剂量,持续30小时。术后30小时内每隔6小时评估血气分析、心率和呼吸频率、瘙痒、恶心、呕吐的发生率及术后镇痛情况。镇痛效果通过0至10的数字分级量表(NGS)进行评估。
在M2时第一组的NGS较低,其余时间段无差异。与基线及第一组相比,第二组和第三组自18小时起疼痛减轻。与其他组相比,第一组需要更多的额外镇痛。
静脉注射吗啡或静脉与硬膜外吗啡联合使用具有更好的镇痛效果,且药物剂量更低。当这些组使用较低镇痛剂量时,这种差异显著,代表了一种有效的开胸手术术后镇痛方法,具有较低的呼吸抑制和催吐作用。