Coyle Andrew, Helenius Ira, Cruz Christina M, Lyons E Allison, May Natalie, Andrilli John, Bannet M Merav, Pinotti Rachel, Thomas David C
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Apr;11(2):132-142. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00596.1.
Ambulatory training in internal medicine residency programs has historically been considered less robust than inpatient-focused training, which prompted a 2009 revision of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Program Requirements in Internal Medicine. This revision was intended to create a balance between inpatient and outpatient training standards and to spur innovation in the ambulatory setting.
We explored innovations in ambulatory education in internal medicine residency programs since the 2009 revision of the ACGME Program Requirements in Internal Medicine.
The authors conducted a scoping review of the literature from 2008 to 2017, searching PubMed, ERIC, and Scopus databases. Articles related to improving educational quality of ambulatory components of US-based internal medicine residency programs were eligible for inclusion. Articles were screened for relevance and theme categorization and then divided into 6 themes: clinic redesign, curriculum development, evaluating resident practice/performance, teaching methods, program evaluation, and faculty development. Once a theme was assigned, data extraction and quality assessment using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) score were completed.
A total of 967 potentially relevant articles were discovered; of those, 182 were deemed relevant and underwent full review. Most articles fell into curriculum development and clinic redesign themes. The majority of included studies were from a single institution, used nonstandardized tools, and assessed outcomes at the satisfaction or knowledge/attitude/skills levels. Few studies showed behavioral changes or patient-level outcomes.
While a rich diversity of educational innovations have occurred since the 2009 revision of the ACGME Program Requirements in Internal Medicine, there is a significant need for multi-institution studies and higher-level assessment.
在内科住院医师培训项目中,门诊培训历来被认为不如以住院患者为重点的培训完善,这促使研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)于2009年修订了内科项目要求。此次修订旨在平衡住院和门诊培训标准,并推动门诊环境中的创新。
我们探讨了自2009年ACGME内科项目要求修订以来,内科住院医师培训项目门诊教育的创新情况。
作者对2008年至2017年的文献进行了范围综述,检索了PubMed、ERIC和Scopus数据库。与提高美国内科住院医师培训项目门诊部分教育质量相关的文章符合纳入标准。对文章进行相关性筛选和主题分类,然后分为6个主题:诊所重新设计、课程开发、评估住院医师实践/表现、教学方法、项目评估和教师发展。一旦确定主题,便使用医学教育研究质量工具(MERSQI)评分完成数据提取和质量评估。
共发现967篇潜在相关文章;其中182篇被认为相关并进行了全面审查。大多数文章属于课程开发和诊所重新设计主题。纳入的研究大多来自单一机构,使用非标准化工具,并在满意度或知识/态度/技能层面评估结果。很少有研究显示行为改变或患者层面的结果。
自2009年ACGME内科项目要求修订以来,虽然出现了丰富多样的教育创新,但仍迫切需要多机构研究和更高层次的评估。