Bonanni Paolo, Breuer Judith, Gershon Anne, Gershon Michael, Hryniewicz Waleria, Papaevangelou Vana, Rentier Bernard, Rümke Hans, Sadzot-Delvaux Catherine, Senterre Jacques, Weil-Olivier Catherine, Wutzler Peter
Department of Public Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
BMC Med. 2009 May 28;7:26. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-26.
Varicella is a common viral disease affecting almost the entire birth cohort. Although usually self-limiting, some cases of varicella can be serious, with 2 to 6% of cases attending a general practice resulting in complications. The hospitalisation rate for varicella in Europe ranges from 1.3 to 4.5 per 100,000 population/year and up to 10.1% of hospitalised patients report permanent or possible permanent sequelae (for example, scarring or ataxia). However, in many countries the epidemiology of varicella remains largely unknown or incomplete. In countries where routine childhood vaccination against varicella has been implemented, it has had a positive effect on disease prevention and control. Furthermore, mathematical models indicate that this intervention strategy may provide economic benefits for the individual and society. Despite this evidence and recommendations for varicella vaccination by official bodies such as the World Health Organization, and scientific experts in the field, the majority of European countries (with the exception of Germany and Greece) have delayed decisions on implementation of routine childhood varicella vaccination, choosing instead to vaccinate high-risk groups or not to vaccinate at all. In this paper, members of the Working Against Varicella in Europe group consider the practicalities of introducing routine childhood varicella vaccination in Europe, discussing the benefits and challenges of different vaccination options (vaccination vs. no vaccination, routine vaccination of infants vs. vaccination of susceptible adolescents or adults, two doses vs. one dose of varicella vaccine, monovalent varicella vaccines vs. tetravalent measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines, as well as the optimal interval between two doses of measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines). Assessment of the epidemiology of varicella in Europe and evidence for the effectiveness of varicella vaccination provides support for routine childhood programmes in Europe. Although European countries are faced with challenges or uncertainties that may have delayed implementation of a childhood vaccination programme, many of these concerns remain hypothetical and with new opportunities offered by combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines, reassessment may be timely.
水痘是一种常见的病毒性疾病,几乎影响整个出生队列。虽然水痘通常具有自限性,但某些病例可能较为严重,在全科医疗就诊的病例中,有2%至6%会出现并发症。欧洲水痘的住院率为每10万人年1.3至4.5例,高达10.1%的住院患者报告有永久性或可能永久性的后遗症(例如,瘢痕形成或共济失调)。然而,在许多国家,水痘的流行病学情况在很大程度上仍然未知或不完整。在实施儿童常规水痘疫苗接种的国家,这对疾病的预防和控制产生了积极影响。此外,数学模型表明,这种干预策略可能为个人和社会带来经济效益。尽管有这些证据以及世界卫生组织等官方机构和该领域科学专家对水痘疫苗接种的建议,但大多数欧洲国家(德国和希腊除外)推迟了关于实施儿童常规水痘疫苗接种的决定,而是选择为高危人群接种疫苗或根本不接种。在本文中,欧洲抗击水痘工作组的成员考虑在欧洲引入儿童常规水痘疫苗接种的实际情况,讨论不同疫苗接种方案(接种疫苗与不接种疫苗、婴儿常规接种疫苗与易感青少年或成人接种疫苗、两剂水痘疫苗与一剂水痘疫苗、单价水痘疫苗与四价麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹和水痘疫苗,以及两剂麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹和水痘疫苗之间的最佳间隔)的益处和挑战。对欧洲水痘流行病学的评估以及水痘疫苗接种有效性的证据为欧洲的儿童常规项目提供了支持。尽管欧洲国家面临可能推迟儿童疫苗接种项目实施的挑战或不确定性,但其中许多担忧仍然是假设性的,随着麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹和水痘联合疫苗带来的新机遇,重新评估可能是及时的。