Baigent Colin, Blackwell Lisa, Collins Rory, Emberson Jonathan, Godwin Jon, Peto Richard, Buring Julie, Hennekens Charles, Kearney Patricia, Meade Tom, Patrono Carlo, Roncaglioni Maria Carla, Zanchetti Alberto
CTSU, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1849-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60503-1.
Low-dose aspirin is of definite and substantial net benefit for many people who already have occlusive vascular disease. We have assessed the benefits and risks in primary prevention.
We undertook meta-analyses of serious vascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death) and major bleeds in six primary prevention trials (95,000 individuals at low average risk, 660,000 person-years, 3554 serious vascular events) and 16 secondary prevention trials (17,000 individuals at high average risk, 43,000 person-years, 3306 serious vascular events) that compared long-term aspirin versus control. We report intention-to-treat analyses of first events during the scheduled treatment period.
In the primary prevention trials, aspirin allocation yielded a 12% proportional reduction in serious vascular events (0.51% aspirin vs 0.57% control per year, p=0.0001), due mainly to a reduction of about a fifth in non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.18%vs 0.23% per year, p<0.0001). The net effect on stroke was not significant (0.20%vs 0.21% per year, p=0.4: haemorrhagic stroke 0.04%vs 0.03%, p=0.05; other stroke 0.16%vs 0.18% per year, p=0.08). Vascular mortality did not differ significantly (0.19%vs 0.19% per year, p=0.7). Aspirin allocation increased major gastrointestinal and extracranial bleeds (0.10%vs 0.07% per year, p<0.0001), and the main risk factors for coronary disease were also risk factors for bleeding. In the secondary prevention trials, aspirin allocation yielded a greater absolute reduction in serious vascular events (6.7%vs 8.2% per year, p<0.0001), with a non-significant increase in haemorrhagic stroke but reductions of about a fifth in total stroke (2.08%vs 2.54% per year, p=0.002) and in coronary events (4.3%vs 5.3% per year, p<0.0001). In both primary and secondary prevention trials, the proportional reductions in the aggregate of all serious vascular events seemed similar for men and women.
In primary prevention without previous disease, aspirin is of uncertain net value as the reduction in occlusive events needs to be weighed against any increase in major bleeds. Further trials are in progress.
UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, and the European Community Biomed Programme.
低剂量阿司匹林对许多已患有闭塞性血管疾病的人具有明确且显著的净效益。我们评估了其在一级预防中的效益和风险。
我们对六项一级预防试验(95000名平均风险较低的个体,660000人年,3554例严重血管事件)和16项二级预防试验(17000名平均风险较高的个体,43000人年,3306例严重血管事件)进行了荟萃分析,这些试验比较了长期服用阿司匹林与对照组的情况。我们报告了在预定治疗期内首次事件的意向性分析结果。
在一级预防试验中,分配服用阿司匹林使严重血管事件比例降低了12%(阿司匹林组每年0.51%,对照组每年0.57%,p = 0.0001),主要是由于非致命性心肌梗死减少了约五分之一(每年0.18%对0.23%,p < 0.0001)。对中风的净影响不显著(每年0.20%对0.21%,p = 0.4:出血性中风0.04%对0.03%,p = 0.05;其他中风每年0.16%对0.18%,p = 0.08)。血管性死亡率无显著差异(每年0.19%对0.19%,p = 0.7)。分配服用阿司匹林增加了主要胃肠道和颅外出血(每年0.10%对0.07%,p < 0.0001),且冠心病的主要危险因素也是出血的危险因素。在二级预防试验中,分配服用阿司匹林使严重血管事件的绝对降低幅度更大(每年6.7%对8.2%,p < 0.0001),出血性中风有非显著增加,但总中风(每年2.08%对2.54%,p = 0.002)和冠心病事件(每年4.3%对5.3%,p < 0.0001)减少了约五分之一。在一级和二级预防试验中,所有严重血管事件总和的比例降低在男性和女性中似乎相似。
在既往无疾病的一级预防中,阿司匹林的净价值不确定,因为闭塞性事件的减少需要与主要出血的任何增加相权衡。进一步的试验正在进行中。
英国医学研究理事会、英国心脏基金会、英国癌症研究中心和欧洲共同体生物医学计划。