Schneider Christine B, Ziemssen Tjalf, Schuster Benno, Seo Han-Seok, Haehner Antje, Hummel Thomas
Department of Neurology, University of Dresden Medical School, Dresden, Germany.
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2009 Jul;116(7):885-9. doi: 10.1007/s00702-009-0244-7. Epub 2009 May 30.
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether pupillary responses to odorous stimuli reflect their intensity or hedonic tone. A total of 21 healthy subjects participated in the study. Using a computer-controlled olfactometer, subjects received intranasal stimuli including odors of rose (PEA; 2 concentrations), lemon and rotten eggs, plus the trigeminal irritant CO2 (also at two concentrations). Changes in the pupil diameter were obtained ipsilaterally to the side of stimulus presentation. Both trigeminal and olfactory stimulation produced an increase in pupillary diameter. Latencies for pupillary reaction were fastest for the higher concentration of CO2 and slowest after the presentation of PEA at the low concentration. Response amplitudes were largest in response to stimulation with CO2 at the high concentration, while they were smallest in response to odorous stimulation with PEA. Response latencies decreased with increasing stimulus intensity. No such correlation was found for hedonic ratings and pupillary reactions. Thus, the change in the pupillary diameter indicates differences between stimulus modalities and stimulus strength, but not pleasantness or unpleasantness of the odors.
本研究的目的是调查瞳孔对气味刺激的反应是否反映其强度或享乐基调。共有21名健康受试者参与了该研究。使用计算机控制的嗅觉计,受试者接受鼻内刺激,包括玫瑰气味(PEA;2种浓度)、柠檬和臭鸡蛋气味,以及三叉神经刺激物二氧化碳(也有两种浓度)。在刺激呈现一侧的同侧获得瞳孔直径的变化。三叉神经和嗅觉刺激均导致瞳孔直径增加。瞳孔反应的潜伏期在高浓度二氧化碳刺激时最快,在低浓度PEA呈现后最慢。反应幅度在高浓度二氧化碳刺激时最大,而在PEA气味刺激时最小。反应潜伏期随刺激强度增加而缩短。享乐评分与瞳孔反应之间未发现此类相关性。因此,瞳孔直径的变化表明刺激方式和刺激强度之间的差异,但不表明气味的愉悦或不愉悦程度。