Commentary: understanding the underlying politics of health care policy decision making.
作者信息
Blendon Robert J, Steelfisher Gillian K
机构信息
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
出版信息
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1137-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00979.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: understanding the underlying politics of health care policy decision making.评论：理解医疗保健政策决策背后的政治因素。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1137-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00979.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
2
Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.将卫生服务研究应用于政策的途径。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
3
Use of social science data for policy analysis and policy-making.利用社会科学数据进行政策分析和决策。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1981 Fall;59(4):596-603.
4
Health policy roundtable--view from the state legislature: translating research into policy.健康政策圆桌会议——来自州立法机构的观点：将研究转化为政策
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):337-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00359.x.
5
Infusing Science into Politics and Policy: The Importance of Legislators as an Audience in Mental Health Policy Dissemination Research.将科学融入政治与政策：立法者作为心理健康政策传播研究受众的重要性
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Mar;44(2):160-163. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0752-3.
6
Why truth matters: research versus propaganda in the policy debate.为何真相至关重要：政策辩论中的研究与宣传
Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):783-7. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00146.
7
Political analysis and medical care: The Politics of Medicare reconsidered. Essay Review.政治分析与医疗保健：重新审视医疗保险的政治。论文评论
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2001 Feb;26(1):139-46. doi: 10.1215/03616878-26-1-139.
8
Exceptionalism as the rule? U.S. health policy innovation and cross-national learning.以例外主义为常态？美国的卫生政策创新与跨国学习。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998 Feb;23(1):35-51. doi: 10.1215/03616878-23-1-35.
9
A tale of two Editions: Marmor's The Politics of Medicare and the study of health politics after thirty years. Essay Review.两个版本的故事：马默的《医疗保险政治》与三十年后的健康政治研究。论文评论
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2001 Feb;26(1):120-38. doi: 10.1215/03616878-26-1-120.
10
Medicare and the politics of incrementalism. Essay review.医疗保险与渐进主义政治。论文综述。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2001 Feb;26(1):153-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-26-1-153.
引用本文的文献
1
Paramedic Practitioners within ambulance services: views of Australian policymakers, health professionals, and consumers.救护车服务中的护理人员从业者：澳大利亚政策制定者、医疗专业人员和消费者的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12614-y.
2
How should non-emergency EMS presentations be managed? A thematic analysis of politicians', policymakers', clinicians' and consumers' viewpoints.非紧急情况下的急救医疗服务应如何管理？对政治家、政策制定者、临床医生和消费者观点的主题分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 25;14(7):e083866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083866.
3
Integrating Social Determinants in Decision-Making Processes for Health: Insights from Conceptual Frameworks-the 3-D Commission.将社会决定因素纳入健康决策过程：概念框架的见解——3-D 委员会。
J Urban Health. 2021 Aug;98(Suppl 1):51-59. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00560-z. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
4
The weekend effect: does hospital mortality differ by day of the week? A systematic review and meta-analysis.周末效应：医院死亡率在一周中的不同日期是否存在差异？一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3688-3.
5
Using an Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) Approach to Enable Policy Change for Electronic Consultations in Canada.采用综合知识转化（IKT）方法推动加拿大电子咨询的政策变革。
Healthc Policy. 2018 Aug;14(1):19-29. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25551.
6
A mixed-methods study of the implementation of medication adherence policy solutions: how do European countries compare?一项关于药物依从性政策解决方案实施情况的混合方法研究：欧洲国家之间的比较如何？
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Oct 27;9:1505-15. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S85408. eCollection 2015.
7
Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers.镀锌工、引导者、拥护者和捍卫者：政策制定者利用公共卫生研究人员的多种方式。
Milbank Q. 2011 Dec;89(4):564-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00643.x.
本文引用的文献
1
Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.将卫生服务研究应用于政策的途径。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
2
Collective accountability for medical care--toward bundled Medicare payments.医疗护理的集体问责制——迈向捆绑式医疗保险支付。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):3-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0803749.
3
The political management of managed care: explaining variations in state health maintenance organization regulations.管理式医疗的政治管理：解释各州健康维护组织法规的差异
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Jun;32(3):457-95. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-011.
4
Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors.执业医师与公众对医疗差错的看法。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 12;347(24):1933-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022151.
5
Health services research: an evolving definition of the field.卫生服务研究：该领域不断演变的定义。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):7-9.
6
State model: Oregon. The ups and downs of Oregon's rationing plan.州模式：俄勒冈州。俄勒冈州配给计划的起伏。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993 Summer;12(2):66-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.2.66.
7
Research problems in evaluation of health service demonstrations.卫生服务示范评估中的研究问题。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Oct;44(4):182-201.
8
The political ingredient of public health services. A neglected area of research.公共卫生服务的政治因素。一个被忽视的研究领域。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Oct;44(4):13-34.
9
Research into the organization of community health service agencies. An administrator's review.社区卫生服务机构组织架构研究。管理者综述。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:52-93.
Zotero 插件