Suppr超能文献

镀锌工、引导者、拥护者和捍卫者:政策制定者利用公共卫生研究人员的多种方式。

Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers.

机构信息

The Sax Institute, University of Sydney, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2011 Dec;89(4):564-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00643.x.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Public health researchers make a limited but important contribution to policy development. Some engage with policy directly through committees, advisory boards, advocacy coalitions, ministerial briefings, intervention design consultation, and research partnerships with government, as well as by championing research-informed policy in the media. Nevertheless, the research utilization literature has paid little attention to these diverse roles and the ways that policymakers use them. This article describes how policymakers use researchers in policymaking and examines how these activities relate to models of research utilization. It also explores the extent to which policymakers' accounts of using researchers concur with the experiences of "policy-engaged" public health researchers.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with thirty-two Australian civil servants, parliamentary ministers, and ministerial advisers identified as "research-engaged" by public health researchers. We used structured and inductive coding to generate categories that we then compared with some of the major research utilization models.

FINDINGS

Policymakers were sophisticated and multifaceted users of researchers for purposes that we describe as Galvanizing Ideas, Clarification and Advice, Persuasion, and Defense. These categories overlapped but did not wholly fit with research utilization models. Despite the negative connotation, "being used" was reported as reciprocal and uncompromising, although researchers and policymakers were likely to categorize these uses differently. Policymakers countered views expressed by some researchers. That is, they sought robust dialogue and creative thinking rather than compliance, and they valued expert opinion when research was insufficient for decision making. The technical/political character of policy development shaped the ways in which researchers were used.

CONCLUSIONS

Elucidating the diverse roles that public health researchers play in policymaking, and the multiple ways that policymakers use these roles, provides researchers and policymakers with a framework for negotiating and reflecting on activities that may advance the public health goals shared by both.

摘要

背景

公共卫生研究人员对政策制定做出了有限但重要的贡献。一些研究人员通过委员会、顾问委员会、倡导联盟、部长简报、干预设计咨询以及与政府的研究伙伴关系,以及在媒体上倡导以研究为依据的政策,直接参与政策制定。然而,研究利用文献对这些不同的角色以及政策制定者如何利用这些角色关注甚少。本文描述了政策制定者如何在决策中利用研究人员,并探讨了这些活动与研究利用模式的关系。它还探讨了政策制定者对利用研究人员的描述在多大程度上与“参与政策制定的”公共卫生研究人员的经验相符。

方法

我们对 32 名澳大利亚公务员、议会部长和部长顾问进行了半结构化访谈,这些人被公共卫生研究人员认定为“参与研究”。我们使用结构化和归纳编码来生成类别,然后将这些类别与一些主要的研究利用模型进行比较。

结果

政策制定者是老练且多方面的研究人员使用者,其目的我们描述为激发想法、澄清和建议、说服和辩护。这些类别虽然有重叠,但不完全符合研究利用模型。尽管有负面含义,但据报道,“被利用”是相互的,且毫不妥协的,尽管研究人员和政策制定者可能会对这些用途进行不同的分类。政策制定者反驳了一些研究人员的观点。也就是说,他们寻求强有力的对话和创造性思维,而不是遵守,并且在研究不足以做出决策时,他们重视专家意见。政策制定的技术/政治性质塑造了研究人员被利用的方式。

结论

阐明公共卫生研究人员在决策制定中扮演的多种角色,以及政策制定者利用这些角色的多种方式,为研究人员和政策制定者提供了一个框架,用于协商和反思可能推进双方共同的公共卫生目标的活动。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies?将证据转化为政策:需要审慎的策略吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(7):1039-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.034. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
3
What is this knowledge that we seek to "exchange"?我们试图“交流”的这种知识是什么?
Milbank Q. 2010 Dec;88(4):492-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00610.x.
4
History matters for understanding knowledge exchange.历史对于理解知识交流至关重要。
Milbank Q. 2010 Dec;88(4):484-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00609.x.
8
Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.将卫生服务研究应用于政策的途径。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验