Oppenheimer Daniel M, Monin Benoît
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jul;37(5):608-14. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.5.608.
Oppenheimer's (2004) demonstration that causal discounting (when the presence of one cause casts doubt on the presence of another) can happen spontaneously addressed the standing concern that discounting was an artifact of experimental demands, but these results could have resulted from memory inhibition. The present studies rule out this alternative using the same surname frequency estimation paradigm. In Study 1, individuals discounted surname familiarity even when it could be attributed to semantic meaning; in Study 2, participants under cognitive load discounted less; in Study 3, participants who were promised a prize for accuracy discounted more. All three results conform to a spontaneous causal discounting account better than to the inhibition alternative.
奥本海默(2004年)证明因果折扣(当一个原因的存在对另一个原因的存在产生怀疑时)会自发发生,这解决了长期以来人们担心折扣是实验要求的人为产物的问题,但这些结果可能是由记忆抑制导致的。本研究使用相同的姓氏频率估计范式排除了这种可能性。在研究1中,即使姓氏熟悉度可归因于语义含义,个体仍会对其进行折扣;在研究2中,处于认知负荷下的参与者折扣较少;在研究3中,被承诺若回答准确将获得奖励的参与者折扣更多。这三个结果都更符合自发因果折扣的解释,而非抑制的解释。