UCL Centre for International Health and Development, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford St, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Int J Equity Health. 2009 Jun 5;8:21. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-21.
Aggregate urban health statistics mask inequalities. We described maternity care in vulnerable slum communities in Mumbai, and examined differences in care and outcomes between more and less deprived groups.
We collected information through a birth surveillance system covering a population of over 280 000 in 48 vulnerable slum localities. Resident women identified births in their own localities and mothers and families were interviewed at 6 weeks after delivery. We analysed data on 5687 births over one year to September 2006. Socioeconomic status was classified using quartiles of standardized asset scores.
Women in higher socioeconomic quartile groups were less likely to have married and conceived in their teens (Odds ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.79, and 0.82, 0.78-0.87, respectively). There was a socioeconomic gradient away from public sector maternity care with increasing socioeconomic status (0.75, 0.70-0.79 for antenatal care and 0.66, 0.61-0.71 for institutional delivery). Women in the least poor group were five times less likely to deliver at home (0.17, 0.10-0.27) as women in the poorest group and about four times less likely to deliver in the public sector (0.27, 0.21-0.35). Rising socioeconomic status was associated with a lower prevalence of low birth weight (0.91, 0.85-0.97). Stillbirth rates did not vary, but neonatal mortality rates fell non-significantly as socioeconomic status increased (0.88, 0.71-1.08).
Analyses of this type have usually been applied across the population spectrum from richest to poorest, and we were struck by the regularly stepped picture of inequalities within the urban poor, a group that might inadvertently be considered relatively homogeneous. The poorest slum residents are more dependent upon public sector health care, but the regular progression towards the private sector raises questions about its quality and regulation. It also underlines the need for healthcare provision strategies to take account of both sectors.
综合城市健康统计数据掩盖了不平等现象。我们描述了孟买弱势贫民窟社区的产妇保健情况,并检查了较贫困和较不贫困群体之间护理和结果的差异。
我们通过一个覆盖 48 个弱势贫民窟地区超过 28 万人口的出生监测系统收集信息。居住在当地的妇女识别自己当地的分娩情况,在分娩后 6 周对母亲和家庭进行访谈。我们分析了 2006 年 9 月前一年的 5687 例分娩数据。社会经济地位使用标准化资产得分的四分位数进行分类。
社会经济地位较高的 quartile 组的妇女结婚和十几岁怀孕的可能性较小(比值比 0.74,95%置信区间 0.69-0.79 和 0.82,0.78-0.87)。随着社会经济地位的提高,越来越倾向于选择私营部门的产妇保健(产前保健为 0.75,0.70-0.79,机构分娩为 0.66,0.61-0.71)。最不贫困组的妇女在家分娩的可能性比最贫困组低五倍(0.17,0.10-0.27),而在公共部门分娩的可能性则低四倍(0.27,0.21-0.35)。社会经济地位的提高与低出生体重的患病率降低相关(0.91,0.85-0.97)。死产率没有变化,但随着社会经济地位的提高,新生儿死亡率略有下降(0.88,0.71-1.08)。
这种类型的分析通常适用于从最富到最穷的人口范围,但我们对城市贫困人口中不平等现象的阶梯式描绘感到震惊,这一群体可能会被不经意地认为相对同质。最贫困的贫民窟居民更依赖公共部门的医疗保健,但朝着私营部门的常规发展引发了对其质量和监管的质疑。它还强调了医疗保健提供策略需要考虑到这两个部门。