Khan M E, Anker M, Patel B C, Barge S, Sadhwani H, Kohle R
Division of Epidemiological Surveillance and Health Situation and Trend Assessment, World Health Organization, Geneva.
World Health Stat Q. 1991;44(3):145-9.
The use of focus groups as a qualitative method for rapid assessment is discussed. A focus-group session is an in-depth discussion in which a small number of people (usually 8-12) from the target population discuss topics that are of importance for a particular study or project. Generally the participants are chosen purposively, and it is recommended that they should be homogeneous with respect to characteristics which might otherwise impede the free flow of discussion. Focus groups can be used for idea generation, in conjunction with a quantitative method, or as a primary data-collection method. However, if focus groups are used as a primary data-collection method, their results must be treated with caution. The main advantage of using focus-group discussions during rapid assessment is that they provide in-depth information without requiring full-scale anthropological investigations. The informal group setting is believed to make people feel at ease, encouraging them to express their views freely. However, there are a number of limitations to focus-group discussions. The samples are small and purposively selected, and therefore do not allow generalization to larger populations. In addition, as with other qualitative methods, the chances of introducing bias and subjectivity into the interpretation of the data are high. There are a number of methodological issues which still need to be addressed in order to further develop the method. Little is known about how many discussion sessions are needed to be reasonably sure that most aspects related to the subject of inquiry have been explored.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本文讨论了将焦点小组作为一种定性方法用于快速评估的情况。焦点小组会议是一种深入讨论,由目标人群中的少数人(通常为8至12人)讨论对特定研究或项目至关重要的话题。一般来说,参与者是有目的地挑选的,建议他们在可能妨碍自由讨论的特征方面保持同质性。焦点小组可与定量方法结合用于产生想法,或作为主要的数据收集方法。然而,如果将焦点小组用作主要的数据收集方法,其结果必须谨慎对待。在快速评估中使用焦点小组讨论的主要优点是,它们无需进行全面的人类学调查就能提供深入信息。人们认为,非正式的小组环境能让人感到轻松自在,鼓励他们自由表达观点。然而,焦点小组讨论也有一些局限性。样本小且是有目的选择的,因此不能推广到更大的人群。此外,与其他定性方法一样,在数据解释中引入偏差和主观性的可能性很高。为了进一步发展该方法,仍有一些方法学问题需要解决。对于需要进行多少次讨论会议才能合理确定已探讨了与调查主题相关的大多数方面,人们了解甚少。(摘要截选至250字)