• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦点小组在社会与行为研究中的应用:一些方法学问题。

The use of focus groups in social and behavioural research: some methodological issues.

作者信息

Khan M E, Anker M, Patel B C, Barge S, Sadhwani H, Kohle R

机构信息

Division of Epidemiological Surveillance and Health Situation and Trend Assessment, World Health Organization, Geneva.

出版信息

World Health Stat Q. 1991;44(3):145-9.

PMID:1949882
Abstract

The use of focus groups as a qualitative method for rapid assessment is discussed. A focus-group session is an in-depth discussion in which a small number of people (usually 8-12) from the target population discuss topics that are of importance for a particular study or project. Generally the participants are chosen purposively, and it is recommended that they should be homogeneous with respect to characteristics which might otherwise impede the free flow of discussion. Focus groups can be used for idea generation, in conjunction with a quantitative method, or as a primary data-collection method. However, if focus groups are used as a primary data-collection method, their results must be treated with caution. The main advantage of using focus-group discussions during rapid assessment is that they provide in-depth information without requiring full-scale anthropological investigations. The informal group setting is believed to make people feel at ease, encouraging them to express their views freely. However, there are a number of limitations to focus-group discussions. The samples are small and purposively selected, and therefore do not allow generalization to larger populations. In addition, as with other qualitative methods, the chances of introducing bias and subjectivity into the interpretation of the data are high. There are a number of methodological issues which still need to be addressed in order to further develop the method. Little is known about how many discussion sessions are needed to be reasonably sure that most aspects related to the subject of inquiry have been explored.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本文讨论了将焦点小组作为一种定性方法用于快速评估的情况。焦点小组会议是一种深入讨论,由目标人群中的少数人(通常为8至12人)讨论对特定研究或项目至关重要的话题。一般来说,参与者是有目的地挑选的,建议他们在可能妨碍自由讨论的特征方面保持同质性。焦点小组可与定量方法结合用于产生想法,或作为主要的数据收集方法。然而,如果将焦点小组用作主要的数据收集方法,其结果必须谨慎对待。在快速评估中使用焦点小组讨论的主要优点是,它们无需进行全面的人类学调查就能提供深入信息。人们认为,非正式的小组环境能让人感到轻松自在,鼓励他们自由表达观点。然而,焦点小组讨论也有一些局限性。样本小且是有目的选择的,因此不能推广到更大的人群。此外,与其他定性方法一样,在数据解释中引入偏差和主观性的可能性很高。为了进一步发展该方法,仍有一些方法学问题需要解决。对于需要进行多少次讨论会议才能合理确定已探讨了与调查主题相关的大多数方面,人们了解甚少。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
The use of focus groups in social and behavioural research: some methodological issues.焦点小组在社会与行为研究中的应用:一些方法学问题。
World Health Stat Q. 1991;44(3):145-9.
2
How to conduct focus groups: researching group priorities through discussion.如何开展焦点小组讨论:通过讨论研究群体优先事项。
Dev Commun Rep. 1992(77):5.
3
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
4
The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues.医患互动研究:方法学问题综述
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-17.
5
Report from the CDC. Telephone focus groups: an emerging method in public health research.美国疾病控制与预防中心报告。电话焦点小组:公共卫生研究中的一种新兴方法。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 Dec;12(10):945-51. doi: 10.1089/154099903322643866.
6
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
7
What older people want: evidence from a study of remote Scottish communities.老年人想要什么:来自对苏格兰偏远社区的一项研究的证据。
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1166. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
8
There should be more help out here! A qualitative study of the needs of Aboriginal adolescents in rural Australia.这里应该有更多帮助!对澳大利亚农村原住民青少年需求的定性研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1137. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
9
The doctor as focus group moderator--shifting roles and negotiating positions in health research.作为焦点小组主持人的医生——健康研究中角色的转变与立场的协商
Fam Pract. 2005 Jun;22(3):335-40. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi003. Epub 2005 Mar 16.
10
The conducting and reporting of rural health research: rurality and rural population issues.农村卫生研究的开展与报告:农村地区及农村人口问题
Rural Remote Health. 2005 Oct-Dec;5(4):427. Epub 2005 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
People attitudes toward shrine-based faith healing in Sindh, Pakistan.巴基斯坦信德省民众对基于神殿的信仰疗法的态度。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 26;25(1):2931. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23428-2.
2
Alcohol use disorder among people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a large urban case-finding project in central Uganda: prevalence, associated factors and challenges to treatment adherence.乌干达中部一个大型城市病例发现项目中确诊为结核病的人群中的酒精使用障碍:患病率、相关因素及治疗依从性面临的挑战
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2025 Mar 5;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13011-024-00629-3.
3
Socio-cultural determinants of antibiotic resistance: a qualitative study of Greeks' attitudes, perceptions and values.
社会文化因素对抗生素耐药性的影响:希腊人态度、观念和价值观的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;22(1):1439. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13855-w.
4
Telemonitoring and Case Management for Hypertensive and Remote-Dwelling Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease-The Telemonitoring for Improved Kidney Outcomes Study (TIKO): A Clinical Research Protocol.高血压合并慢性肾病的远程居住患者的远程监测与病例管理——改善肾脏结局的远程监测研究(TIKO):一项临床研究方案
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022 Feb 13;9:20543581221077500. doi: 10.1177/20543581221077500. eCollection 2022.
5
Addressing barriers of community participation and access to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination in Coastal Kenya using a participatory approach.采用参与式方法解决肯尼亚沿海地区淋巴丝虫病消除中社区参与和大规模药物治疗机会的障碍。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Sep 16;14(9):e0008499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008499. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Knowledge, attitudes and practices on schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths among caregivers in Ingwavuma area in uMkhanyakude district, South Africa.南非乌姆坎加德地区因格瓦武马地区照顾者对血吸虫病和土壤传播性蠕虫的知识、态度和实践。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4253-3.
7
Public awareness and individual responsibility needed for judicious use of antibiotics: a qualitative study of public beliefs and perceptions.公众意识和个体责任是合理使用抗生素的关键:公众信念和认知的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6047-8.
8
Older Adults Experiences of Learning to Use Tablet Computers: A Mixed Methods Study.老年人学习使用平板电脑的经历:一项混合方法研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 3;9:1631. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01631. eCollection 2018.
9
Knowledge, practices and perceptions of trachoma and its control among communities of Narok County, Kenya.肯尼亚纳罗克县社区对沙眼及其防治的认知、实践与看法。
Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2016 Jul 26;2:13. doi: 10.1186/s40794-016-0029-6. eCollection 2016.
10
Knowledge, practices and perceptions of geo-helminthes infection among parents of pre-school age children of coastal region, Kenya.肯尼亚沿海地区学龄前儿童家长对土源性蠕虫感染的认知、行为及看法
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Mar 30;11(3):e0005514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005514. eCollection 2017 Mar.