University College of Borås, School of Health Sciences, Allégatan 1, Borås 50190, Sweden.
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Apr;18(4):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0673-8. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
The purpose of the study was to describe how interaction about changes in illness and prognosis was shaped by participants in outpatient palliative cancer care consultations.
The data collection involved six video-recorded consultations at an outpatient oncology unit at a university hospital in Sweden. The interactions were studied by means of discourse analysis. Inclusion criteria for the patients were gastro-intestinal cancer and receiving palliative care. The sample included three men and three women, aged 54-70, with various metastasised gastro-intestinal tumours. Significant others (SOs) were included where patients brought one to the consultation. Three male consultants aged 55-59 participated.
In palliative care consultations, the person-to-person and the patient-professional conversation frames were found to be in use as patients, SOs and physicians talked about the patients' illness and prognosis. Within the patient-professional frame, three interactional patterns were found: the patient emphasising emotional experiences of illness or well-being and the physicians responding by toning down strategies, patients asking direct questions and getting straight answers and finally interaction marked by cautiousness and avoidances. Within the person-person frame, the interactions were described as: playful talk, collegial talk and existential talk.
When patients shared their personal interpretations of illness and prognosis, their narrative was more enhanced by the person-to-person frame than the patient-professional frame. Finding out if and how patients and SOs want to express their worries and finding a balance between the interactional patterns that occur are ethical challenges which health professionals must face. Since patients and SOs may restrain their emotional experiences, investigating grounded ways of overcoming these difficulties is imperative.
本研究旨在描述门诊姑息治疗癌症咨询中参与者如何塑造关于疾病和预后变化的互动。
数据收集涉及瑞典一所大学医院肿瘤门诊的六次视频记录咨询。通过话语分析研究了互动。纳入患者的标准为胃肠道癌症和接受姑息治疗。样本包括 3 名男性和 3 名女性,年龄在 54-70 岁之间,患有各种转移性胃肠道肿瘤。将患者带到咨询中的重要他人(SOs)也被纳入其中。三名 55-59 岁的男性顾问参与了研究。
在姑息治疗咨询中,发现人与人之间以及患者与专业人士之间的对话框架都在使用,患者、SOs 和医生谈论患者的疾病和预后。在患者与专业人士的框架内,发现了三种互动模式:患者强调疾病或幸福感的情感体验,医生通过淡化策略来回应,患者直接提问并得到直接回答,最后是谨慎和回避的互动。在人与人之间的框架内,互动被描述为:玩笑话、同事间的谈话和存在主义的谈话。
当患者分享他们对疾病和预后的个人解释时,他们的叙述在人与人间的框架中比在患者与专业人士的框架中更有增强。了解患者和 SOs 是否希望表达他们的担忧以及在发生的互动模式之间找到平衡是卫生专业人员必须面对的伦理挑战。由于患者和 SOs 可能会抑制他们的情感体验,因此调查克服这些困难的实际方法至关重要。