Funderskov Karen Frydenrejn, Raunkiær Mette, Danbjørg Dorthe Boe, Zwisler Ann-Dorthe, Munk Lene, Jess Mia, Dieperink Karin Brochstedt
REHPA - Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, University of Southern Denmark, Nyborg, Denmark.
Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, CIMT, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 21;21(3):e10208. doi: 10.2196/10208.
The work of specialized palliative care (SPC) teams is often challenged by substantial amounts of time spent driving to and from patients' homes and long distances between the patients and the hospitals.
Video consultations may be a solution for real-time SPC at home. The aim of this study was to explore the use of video consultations, experienced by patients and their relatives, as part of SPC at home.
This explorative and qualitative study included palliative care patients in different stages and relatives to use video consultations as a part of their SPC between October 2016 and March 2017. Data collection took place in the patients' homes and consisted of participant observations followed by semistructured interviews. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with the need for SPC, aged more than 18 years, who agreed to participate, and relatives wanting to participate in the video consultations. Data were analyzed with Giorgi's descriptive phenomenological methodology.
A number of patients (n=11) and relatives (n=3) were included and, in total, 86 video consultations were conducted. Patients participating varied in time from 1 month to 6 months, and the number of video consultations per patient varied from 3 to 18. The use of video consultations led to a situation where patients, despite life-threatening illnesses and technical difficulties, took an active role. In addition, relatives were able to join on equal terms, which increased active involvement. The patients had different opinions on when to initiate the use of video consultations in SPC; it was experienced as optional at the initiating stage as well as the final stage of illness. If the video consultations included multiple participants from the SPC team, the use of video consultations could be difficult to complete without interruptions.
Video consultations in SPC for home-based patients are feasible and facilitate a strengthened involvement and communication between patients, relatives, and SPC team members.
专科姑息治疗(SPC)团队的工作常常面临挑战,因为往返患者家中需要花费大量时间,且患者与医院之间距离较远。
视频会诊可能是在家中进行实时SPC的一种解决方案。本研究的目的是探讨患者及其亲属体验到的视频会诊作为在家中SPC一部分的使用情况。
这项探索性定性研究纳入了2016年10月至2017年3月期间处于不同阶段的姑息治疗患者及其亲属,将视频会诊作为其SPC的一部分。数据收集在患者家中进行,包括参与观察,随后进行半结构化访谈。纳入标准包括需要SPC、年龄超过18岁且同意参与的患者,以及希望参与视频会诊的亲属。数据采用 Giorgi 的描述性现象学方法进行分析。
纳入了一些患者(n = 11)和亲属(n = 3),总共进行了86次视频会诊。参与的患者时间从1个月到6个月不等,每位患者的视频会诊次数从3次到18次不等。视频会诊的使用导致了这样一种情况,即患者尽管患有危及生命的疾病且存在技术困难,但仍发挥了积极作用。此外,亲属能够平等参与,这增加了积极参与度。患者对何时在SPC中开始使用视频会诊有不同意见;在疾病的起始阶段和末期,视频会诊都被视为是可选择的。如果视频会诊包括SPC团队的多名参与者,那么视频会诊可能难以顺利完成而不被打断。
针对居家患者的SPC中的视频会诊是可行的,并且有助于加强患者、亲属和SPC团队成员之间的参与度和沟通。