Mei Q
Suzhou Guang Ji Hospital.
Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi. 1991 Aug;24(4):200-2, 251.
One hundred and nine clinically diagnosed manic patients were examined and re-diagnosed with SADS/RDC. The results of joint-test and test-retest showed that the reliabilities of the subscales of SADS were good enough for clinical use. The mania subscale score of SADS showed significant negative correlation with GAS score, but positive correlation with SI or BRMS. The results of joint-test and test-retest showed that the diagnosis of mania by the use of SADS/RDC were reliable. The concurrent validity between SADS/RDC and CMA-H was higher. This study indicated that SADA/RDC can be used satisfactorily in clinical practice.
对109名临床诊断为躁狂的患者进行了检查,并采用情感障碍和精神分裂症系统访谈表/研究诊断标准(SADS/RDC)进行重新诊断。联合测试和重测结果表明,SADS各分量表的信度足以用于临床。SADS的躁狂分量表得分与大体评定量表(GAS)得分呈显著负相关,但与自杀意念(SI)或倍克-拉范森躁狂量表(BRMS)呈正相关。联合测试和重测结果表明,使用SADS/RDC诊断躁狂是可靠的。SADS/RDC与中国躁狂评定量表(CMA-H)之间的同时效度较高。本研究表明,SADA/RDC可在临床实践中得到满意应用。