Beyer C A, Cabanela M E, Berquist T H
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Nov;73(6):977-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B6.1955448.
We treated 36 patients with unilateral facet dislocations or fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine at the Mayo Clinic between 1975 and 1986. Adequate records were available for 34: ten patients were treated by open reduction and posterior fusion, and 24 by nonoperative management. Of these, 19 had halo traction followed by halo-thoracic immobilisation, four had a simple cervicothoracic orthosis, and one received no active treatment. Anatomical reduction was achieved more frequently in the operative group (60% compared with 25%). Nonoperative treatment was more likely to result in cervical translation on flexion/extension lateral radiographs, and in significant symptoms. Only 36% of the patients treated by halo traction achieved anatomical alignment; in 25% halo traction failed to achieve or maintain any degree of reduction. During halo-thoracic immobilisation, half of the patients lost some degree of reduction and patient satisfaction with the appliance was low. Open reduction and internal fixation of unilateral facet injuries gave better results. 6
1975年至1986年间,我们在梅奥诊所治疗了36例颈椎单侧小关节脱位或骨折脱位患者。34例患者有完整记录:10例接受切开复位和后路融合治疗,24例接受非手术治疗。其中,19例采用头环牵引,随后行头环-胸廓固定,4例使用简单的颈胸矫形器,1例未接受积极治疗。手术组更常实现解剖复位(分别为60%和25%)。非手术治疗更易导致颈椎屈伸侧位X线片上出现颈椎移位,并出现明显症状。采用头环牵引治疗的患者中只有36%实现了解剖复位;25%的患者头环牵引未能实现或维持任何程度的复位。在头环-胸廓固定期间,一半的患者出现了一定程度的复位丢失,患者对该器具的满意度较低。单侧小关节损伤的切开复位和内固定效果更好。