Suppr超能文献

芦荟大黄素在小鼠体内彗星试验中诱导的DNA片段化。

Aloe-emodin-induced DNA fragmentation in the mouse in vivo comet assay.

作者信息

Nesslany Fabrice, Simar-Meintières Sophie, Ficheux Hervé, Marzin Daniel

机构信息

Laboratoire de Toxicologie Génétique - Institut Pasteur de Lille, 1 rue du Pr. Calmette, 59019 Lille Cedex, France.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 2009 Aug;678(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jun 24.

Abstract

Aloe-emodin (AE) and derivatives may be present as undesired components co-extracted during extraction of plants containing anthraquinonic derivatives for preparation of diacetylrhein. AE is a well-known in vitro mutagen, but up to now it failed to induce any clear in vivo genotoxic activity in the chromosome aberration assay in rat bone marrow or the in vivo/in vitro UDS test in liver. However, the two target organs noted during rodent carcinogenicity studies with danthron and emodin, two other well-known anthraquinone derivatives, are the colon and the kidney. Therefore, the choice of the organs for testing the genotoxicity of AE, i.e. bone marrow and liver, may be considered inadequate to demonstrate a possible in vivo genotoxic activity. In this context, the in vivo mouse comet assay was performed on both isolated kidney and colon cells in order to demonstrate a possible organospecific genotoxicity after oral administration of AE. Concurrently, the Ames test and the in vitro micronucleus assay with TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells were performed in their microscale version both with S9 from Aroclor 1254-induced liver or kidney, and without S9. AE induced primary DNA damage in the liver and in the kidney as observed between 3 and 6h after two oral administrations at 500, 1000 and 2000mg/kg bw, underlining an in vivo genotoxic mechanism of action. Furthermore, AE induced a clear genotoxic activity both in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1537 and TA98 and in the in vitro micronucleus assay in the absence as well as in the presence of metabolic activation. As no significant variation in the genotoxic activity of AE was noted when using either liver or kidney S9-mix, it seems that no quantitatively and/or qualitatively specific renal metabolism occurs. The kidney may be a target organ of AE as it is the major route of excretion. Under such conditions the separation of AE components should take place and the residual content of undesired AE derivatives should be made as low as reasonably achievable. AE present in plant extracts should be considered as an in vivo genotoxin and this property should be taken into account in the risk assessment for human exposure.

摘要

芦荟大黄素(AE)及其衍生物可能作为不需要的成分在提取含蒽醌衍生物的植物以制备二乙酰大黄酸的过程中被共提取出来。AE是一种广为人知的体外诱变剂,但到目前为止,在大鼠骨髓染色体畸变试验或肝脏的体内/体外UDS试验中,它未能诱导出任何明显的体内遗传毒性活性。然而,在对另外两种著名的蒽醌衍生物丹蒽醌和大黄素进行的啮齿动物致癌性研究中,发现的两个靶器官是结肠和肾脏。因此,选择骨髓和肝脏来测试AE的遗传毒性,可能被认为不足以证明其可能的体内遗传毒性活性。在这种情况下,对分离的肾脏和结肠细胞进行了体内小鼠彗星试验,以证明口服AE后可能存在的器官特异性遗传毒性。同时,采用来自Aroclor 1254诱导的肝脏或肾脏的S9以及无S9的微型版本进行了Ames试验和TK6人淋巴母细胞体外微核试验。在以500、1000和2000mg/kg体重进行两次口服给药后3至6小时观察到,AE在肝脏和肾脏中诱导了原发性DNA损伤,突出了其体内遗传毒性作用机制。此外,在沙门氏菌鼠伤寒菌株TA1537和TA98以及体外微核试验中,无论有无代谢激活,AE都诱导了明显的遗传毒性活性。当使用肝脏或肾脏S9混合物时,未发现AE的遗传毒性活性有显著变化,似乎不存在定量和/或定性特异性的肾脏代谢。肾脏可能是AE的靶器官,因为它是主要的排泄途径。在这种情况下,应进行AE成分的分离,并且应将不需要的AE衍生物的残留量降低到合理可行的最低水平。植物提取物中存在的AE应被视为体内基因毒素,在评估人类接触风险时应考虑到这一特性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验