医学教师对科学的态度及医学研究的动机取向

Medical teachers' attitudes towards science and motivational orientation for medical research.

作者信息

Cvek Mario, Hren Darko, Sambunjak Dario, Planinc Mislav, Macković Maja, Marusić Ana, Marusić Matko

机构信息

Zagreb University School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(7-8):256-61. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1148-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research is an important motivating factor for pursuing a career in academic medicine, but the relation between motivation and other factors involved in scientific research are not clear.

PURPOSE

To explore the motivational orientation for doing research and its relation with attitudes towards science and publication practice among members of faculty at a medical school.

METHODS

We used a Science Attitude Survey and the Work Preference Inventory (intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientation using 4 Likert-type scales of motivation, possible range 1-5) to survey two groups of teachers at the Zagreb University School of Medicine (n = 327, 66% response rate): professors, elected to tenure-track positions (n = 150), and instructor/research fellows working on or just completing their thesis (n = 177).

RESULTS

Overall, teachers scored highest on the Enjoyment subscale of intrinsic motivational orientation (mean score +/- standard deviation 4.3 +/- 0.42 for professors vs 4.1 +/- 0.42 for instructors/research fellows, P = 0.001, t-test). Professors also scored higher than instructors/research fellows on the Challenge subscale of intrinsic motivational orientation (3.8 +/- 0.55 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.64, P < 0.001, t-test), whereas instructors/research fellows scored higher on the Compensation subscale of extrinsic motivational orientation (3.5 +/- 0.74 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.71, P < 0.001, t-test). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the number of publications was positively associated with scores on the Science Attitude Survey and the Challenge subscale of intrinsic motivation, and negatively associated with scores on the Compensation subscale of extrinsic motivation.

CONCLUSIONS

Members of the medical faculty differ in motivational orientation for research depending on their academic status, and their motivation is associated more with requirements for academic advancement than with research. These findings have important implications for developing strategies for enhancing academic research production.

摘要

背景

研究是从事学术医学职业的一个重要激励因素,但动机与科学研究中其他相关因素之间的关系尚不清楚。

目的

探讨医学院校教师进行研究的动机取向及其与对科学的态度和发表实践的关系。

方法

我们使用科学态度调查问卷和工作偏好量表(使用4个动机李克特式量表测量内在和外在动机取向,可能范围为1 - 5)对萨格勒布大学医学院的两组教师进行调查(n = 327,回复率66%):被选入终身教职岗位的教授(n = 150),以及正在撰写或刚完成论文的讲师/研究员(n = 177)。

结果

总体而言,教师在内在动机取向的享受子量表上得分最高(教授的平均得分±标准差为4.3±0.42,讲师/研究员为4.1±0.42,P = 0.001,t检验)。教授在内在动机取向的挑战子量表上得分也高于讲师/研究员(3.8±0.55对3.5±0.64,P < 0.001,t检验),而讲师/研究员在外在动机取向的报酬子量表上得分更高(3.5±0.74对3.1±0.71,P < 0.001,t检验)。多元线性回归分析表明,发表论文的数量与科学态度调查问卷得分以及内在动机的挑战子量表得分呈正相关,与外在动机的报酬子量表得分呈负相关。

结论

医学教师群体在研究的动机取向上因其学术地位而异,他们的动机更多地与学术晋升要求相关,而非与研究相关。这些发现对制定提高学术研究产出的策略具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索