Chen Zhong-Xin
Department of Rehabilitation, Sanmenxia City Central Hospital, Henan Province, Sanmenxia 472000, China.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2009 Apr;29(4):275-8.
To observe the therapeutic effect of warm needle moxibustion on chronic non-bacterial prostatitis.
One hundred and twenty-five cases were randomly divided into a warm needle moxibustion group (n = 42), an acupuncture group (n = 41) and a western medicine group (n = 42). The warm needle moxibustion group was treated with acupuncture at Shenshu (BL 23), Ganshu (BL 18), Zhibian (BL 54) with no retention of the needles, and warm needle moxibustion on Guanyuan (CV 4), Zhongji (CV 3), Yinlingquan (SP 9), Sanyin-jiao (SP 6), once daily; the acupuncture group with acupuncture at the same acupoints as the warm needle moxibus tion group with no moxibustion; and the western medicine group with oral administration of Prostat Tablets, one tablet each time, twice daily. The therapeutic effects and scores of chronic prostatitis symptom indexes (NIH-CPSI) were compared.
The total effective rate was 88.10% in the warm needle moxibustion group, 63.41% in the acupuncture group and 66.67% in the western medicine group, the warm needle moxibustion group being better than the acupuncture group and the western medicine group (both P < 0.05). After treatment, the scores of NIH-CPSI was 11.92 +/- 7.11 in the warm needle moxibustion group, 16.08 +/- 6.83 in the acupuncture group and 15.66 +/- 5.88 in the western medicine group, with significant decreases in the 3 groups as compared with those before treatment (all P < 0.01), and after treatment, the score in the warm needle moxibustion group was significant different to that of the acupuncture group or the western medicine group (both P < 0.01).
The warm needle moxibustion has a good therapeutic effect on chronic non-bacterial prostatitis.
观察温针艾灸治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎的疗效。
将125例患者随机分为温针艾灸组(n = 42)、针刺组(n = 41)和西药组(n = 42)。温针艾灸组针刺肾俞(BL 23)、肝俞(BL 18)、秩边(BL 54)不留针,关元(CV 4)、中极(CV 3)、阴陵泉(SP 9)、三阴交(SP 6)温针艾灸,每日1次;针刺组针刺穴位同温针艾灸组,但不进行艾灸;西药组口服前列康片,每次1片,每日2次。比较慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)的疗效及评分。
温针艾灸组总有效率为88.10%,针刺组为63.41%,西药组为66.67%,温针艾灸组疗效优于针刺组和西药组(均P < 0.05)。治疗后,温针艾灸组NIH-CPSI评分为11.92±7.11,针刺组为16.08±6.83,西药组为15.66±5.88,3组与治疗前比较均显著降低(均P < 0.01),且温针艾灸组治疗后评分与针刺组或西药组比较差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.01)。
温针艾灸治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎疗效良好。