Service de Microbiologie–Hygiène, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;49(2):491-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01274-10. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium bolletii, and Mycobacterium massiliense (Mycobacterium abscessus sensu lato) are closely related species that currently are identified by the sequencing of the rpoB gene. However, recent studies show that rpoB sequencing alone is insufficient to discriminate between these species, and some authors have questioned their current taxonomic classification. We studied here a large collection of M. abscessus (sensu lato) strains by partial rpoB sequencing (752 bp) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). The final MLSA scheme developed was based on the partial sequences of eight housekeeping genes: argH, cya, glpK, gnd, murC, pgm, pta, and purH. The strains studied included the three type strains (M. abscessus CIP 104536(T), M. massiliense CIP 108297(T), and M. bolletii CIP 108541(T)) and 120 isolates recovered between 1997 and 2007 in France, Germany, Switzerland, and Brazil. The rpoB phylogenetic tree confirmed the existence of three main clusters, each comprising the type strain of one species. However, divergence values between the M. massiliense and M. bolletii clusters all were below 3% and between the M. abscessus and M. massiliense clusters were from 2.66 to 3.59%. The tree produced using the concatenated MLSA gene sequences (4,071 bp) also showed three main clusters, each comprising the type strain of one species. The M. abscessus cluster had a bootstrap value of 100% and was mostly compact. Bootstrap values for the M. massiliense and M. bolletii branches were much lower (71 and 61%, respectively), with the M. massiliense cluster having a fuzzy aspect. Mean (range) divergence values were 2.17% (1.13 to 2.58%) between the M. abscessus and M. massiliense clusters, 2.37% (1.5 to 2.85%) between the M. abscessus and M. bolletii clusters, and 2.28% (0.86 to 2.68%) between the M. massiliense and M. bolletii clusters. Adding the rpoB sequence to the MLSA-concatenated sequence (total sequence, 4,823 bp) had little effect on the clustering of strains. We found 10/120 (8.3%) isolates for which the concatenated MLSA gene sequence and rpoB sequence were discordant (e.g., M. massiliense MLSA sequence and M. abscessus rpoB sequence), suggesting the intergroup lateral transfers of rpoB. In conclusion, our study strongly supports the recent proposal that M. abscessus, M. massiliense, and M. bolletii should constitute a single species. Our findings also indicate that there has been a horizontal transfer of rpoB sequences between these subgroups, precluding the use of rpoB sequencing alone for the accurate identification of the two proposed M. abscessus subspecies.
脓肿分枝杆菌、博莱氏分枝杆菌和马赛分枝杆菌(广义的脓肿分枝杆菌)是密切相关的物种,目前通过 rpoB 基因的测序来鉴定。然而,最近的研究表明,单独进行 rpoB 测序不足以区分这些物种,一些作者对它们目前的分类提出了质疑。我们在此通过部分 rpoB 测序(752bp)和多位点序列分析(MLSA)研究了大量的脓肿分枝杆菌(广义)菌株。最终开发的最终 MLSA 方案基于 8 个看家基因的部分序列:argH、cya、glpK、gnd、murC、pgm、pta 和 purH。所研究的菌株包括三种模式株(脓肿分枝杆菌 CIP 104536(T)、马赛分枝杆菌 CIP 108297(T)和博莱氏分枝杆菌 CIP 108541(T))和 1997 年至 2007 年期间在法国、德国、瑞士和巴西分离的 120 株分离株。rpoB 系统发育树证实了三个主要簇的存在,每个簇都包含一种物种的模式株。然而,马萨诸塞分枝杆菌和博莱氏分枝杆菌簇之间的分歧值均低于 3%,而脓肿分枝杆菌和马萨诸塞分枝杆菌簇之间的分歧值为 2.66 至 3.59%。使用串联 MLSA 基因序列(4071bp)生成的树也显示了三个主要簇,每个簇都包含一种物种的模式株。脓肿分枝杆菌簇的自举值为 100%,且大多紧凑。马萨诸塞分枝杆菌和博莱氏分枝杆菌分支的自举值要低得多(分别为 71%和 61%),马萨诸塞分枝杆菌簇具有模糊的特征。脓肿分枝杆菌和马萨诸塞分枝杆菌簇之间的平均(范围)分歧值为 2.17%(1.13-2.58%),脓肿分枝杆菌和博莱氏分枝杆菌簇之间的分歧值为 2.37%(1.5-2.85%),马萨诸塞分枝杆菌和博莱氏分枝杆菌簇之间的分歧值为 2.28%(0.86-2.68%)。将 rpoB 序列添加到 MLSA 串联序列(总序列,4823bp)对菌株聚类几乎没有影响。我们发现 10/120(8.3%)个分离株的串联 MLSA 基因序列和 rpoB 序列不一致(例如,马萨诸塞分枝杆菌 MLSA 序列和脓肿分枝杆菌 rpoB 序列),这表明 rpoB 基因在这些组间发生了水平转移。总之,我们的研究强烈支持脓肿分枝杆菌、马萨诸塞分枝杆菌和博莱氏分枝杆菌应构成一个单一物种的最新建议。我们的研究结果还表明,在这些亚群之间已经发生了 rpoB 序列的横向转移,因此单独使用 rpoB 测序无法准确鉴定这两个提议的脓肿分枝杆菌亚种。