Zelazny Adrian M, Root Jeremy M, Shea Yvonne R, Colombo Rhonda E, Shamputa Isdore C, Stock Frida, Conlan Sean, McNulty Steven, Brown-Elliott Barbara A, Wallace Richard J, Olivier Kenneth N, Holland Steven M, Sampaio Elizabeth P
Microbiology Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, NIAD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jul;47(7):1985-95. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01688-08. Epub 2009 May 6.
Mycobacterium abscessus is the most common cause of rapidly growing mycobacterial chronic lung disease. Recently, two new M. abscessus-related species, M. massiliense and M. bolletii, have been described. Health care-associated outbreaks have recently been investigated by the use of molecular identification and typing tools; however, very little is known about the natural epidemiology and pathogenicity of M. massiliense or M. bolletii outside of outbreak situations. The differentiation of these two species from M. abscessus is difficult and relies on the sequencing of one or more housekeeping genes. We performed extensive molecular identification and typing of 42 clinical isolates of M. abscessus, M. massiliense, and M. bolletii from patients monitored at the NIH between 1999 and 2007. The corresponding clinical data were also examined. Partial sequencing of rpoB, hsp65, and secA led to the unambiguous identification of 26 M. abscessus isolates, 7 M. massiliense isolates, and 2 M. bolletii isolates. The identification results for seven other isolates were ambiguous and warranted further sequencing and an integrated phylogenetic analysis. Strain relatedness was assessed by repetitive-sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which showed the characteristic clonal groups for each species. Five isolates with ambiguous species identities as M. abscessus-M. massiliense by rpoB, hsp65, and secA sequencing clustered as a distinct group by rep-PCR and PFGE together with the M. massiliense type strain. Overall, the clinical manifestations of disease caused by each species were similar. In summary, a multilocus sequencing approach (not just rpoB partial sequencing) is required for division of M. abscessus and closely related species. Molecular typing complements sequence-based identification and provides information on prevalent clones with possible relevant clinical aspects.
脓肿分枝杆菌是快速生长的分枝杆菌性慢性肺病最常见的病因。最近,已描述了两种新的与脓肿分枝杆菌相关的菌种,即马赛分枝杆菌和博勒分枝杆菌。最近利用分子鉴定和分型工具对医疗保健相关的暴发进行了调查;然而,对于马赛分枝杆菌或博勒分枝杆菌在暴发情况之外的自然流行病学和致病性知之甚少。将这两个菌种与脓肿分枝杆菌区分开来很困难,且依赖于一个或多个管家基因的测序。我们对1999年至2007年期间在美国国立卫生研究院监测的患者的42株脓肿分枝杆菌、马赛分枝杆菌和博勒分枝杆菌临床分离株进行了广泛的分子鉴定和分型。还检查了相应的临床数据。rpoB、hsp65和secA的部分测序明确鉴定出26株脓肿分枝杆菌分离株、7株马赛分枝杆菌分离株和2株博勒分枝杆菌分离株。其他7株分离株的鉴定结果不明确,需要进一步测序和进行综合系统发育分析。通过基于重复序列的PCR(rep-PCR)和脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)评估菌株相关性,结果显示了每个菌种的特征性克隆群。通过rpoB、hsp65和secA测序鉴定为脓肿分枝杆菌-马赛分枝杆菌但菌种身份不明确的5株分离株,通过rep-PCR和PFGE与马赛分枝杆菌模式菌株聚类为一个独特的组。总体而言,由每个菌种引起的疾病临床表现相似。总之,脓肿分枝杆菌和密切相关菌种的区分需要多基因座测序方法(而不仅仅是rpoB部分测序)。分子分型补充了基于序列的鉴定,并提供了有关可能具有相关临床意义的流行克隆的信息。