Emotional Development and Affective Neuroscience Branch, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH/DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;50(12):1550-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02121.x. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
Anxiety disorders are characterized by elevated, sustained responses to threat, that manifest as threat attention biases. Recent evidence also suggests exaggerated responses to incentives. How these characteristics influence cognitive control is under debate and is the focus of the present study.
Twenty-five healthy adolescents and 25 adolescents meeting DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder were compared on a task of response inhibition. Inhibitory control was assayed with an antisaccade task that included both incentive (monetary reward) and incidental emotion (facial expression) cues presented prior to the execution of inhibitory behavior.
Inhibitory control was enhanced following exposure to threat cues (fear faces) only in adolescent patients, and following exposure to positive cues (happy faces) only in healthy adolescents. Results also revealed a robust performance improvement associated with monetary incentives. This incentive effect did not differ by group. No interaction between incentives and emotional cues was detected.
These findings suggest that biased processing of threat in anxious adolescents affects inhibitory control, perhaps by raising arousal prior to behavioral performance. The absence of normalization of performance in anxious adolescents following exposure to positive emotional cues is a novel finding and will require additional exploration. Future studies will need to more specifically examine how perturbations in positive emotion processes contribute to the symptomatology and the pathogenesis of anxiety disorders.
焦虑障碍的特征是对威胁的反应升高和持续,表现为威胁注意偏向。最近的证据还表明对奖励的反应过度。这些特征如何影响认知控制仍存在争议,也是本研究的重点。
将 25 名健康青少年和 25 名符合 DSM-IV 焦虑障碍诊断标准的青少年进行比较,比较他们在反应抑制任务上的表现。使用反扫视任务来测试抑制控制,该任务包括在执行抑制行为之前呈现激励(货币奖励)和偶然情绪(面部表情)线索。
只有在青少年患者中,暴露于威胁线索(恐惧面孔)后抑制控制得到增强,而只有在健康青少年中,暴露于积极线索(快乐面孔)后抑制控制得到增强。结果还显示出与货币奖励相关的强大的性能提升。这种激励效应不受组别的影响。没有检测到激励和情绪线索之间的相互作用。
这些发现表明,焦虑青少年对威胁的偏见处理会影响抑制控制,可能是通过在行为表现之前提高唤醒水平。焦虑青少年在暴露于积极情绪线索后,其表现没有正常化,这是一个新的发现,需要进一步探索。未来的研究需要更具体地研究积极情绪过程的干扰如何导致焦虑障碍的症状和发病机制。