Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Center for Ethics, Humanities and Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Gerontologist. 2009 Dec;49(6):803-15. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp092. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
The objectives of this study were to develop measures of end-of-life (EOL) care processes in nursing homes and to validate the instrument for measuring them.
A survey of directors of nursing was conducted in 608 eligible nursing homes in New York State. Responses were obtained from 313 (51.5% response rate) facilities. Secondary data on structural characteristics of the nursing homes were obtained from the Online Survey Certification and Reporting System. Exploratory factor analyses and internal consistency reliability analyses were performed. Multivariate regression models with fixed and random effects were estimated.
Four EOL process domains were identified-assessment, delivery, communication and coordination of care among providers, and communication with residents and families. The scales measuring these EOL process domains demonstrated acceptable to high internal consistency reliability and face, content, and construct validity. Facilities with more EOL quality assurance or monitoring mechanisms in place and greater emphasis on EOL staff education had better scores on EOL care processes of assessment, communication and coordination among providers, and care delivery. Facilities with better registered nurse and certified nurse aide staffing ratios and those with religious affiliation also scored higher on selected care process measures.
This study offers a new validated tool for measuring EOL care processes in nursing homes. Our findings suggest wide variations in care processes across facilities, which in part may stem from lack of gold standards for EOL practice in nursing homes.
本研究旨在制定养老院临终关怀流程的衡量标准,并对该工具进行验证。
在纽约州的 608 家符合条件的养老院中对护理主任进行了一项调查。从 313 家(51.5%的回复率)设施中获得了回应。养老院结构特征的二级数据来自在线调查认证和报告系统。进行了探索性因素分析和内部一致性可靠性分析。使用固定和随机效应的多元回归模型进行了估计。
确定了四个临终关怀流程领域——评估、护理提供、提供者之间的沟通和协调,以及与居民和家属的沟通。衡量这些临终关怀流程领域的量表表现出可接受至高度的内部一致性可靠性,以及良好的表面、内容和结构有效性。在临终关怀质量保证或监测机制方面做得更好,以及更加重视临终关怀员工教育的设施,在评估、提供者之间的沟通和协调以及护理提供方面的临终关怀流程得分更高。具有更好的注册护士和认证护士助理人员配备比例以及具有宗教信仰的设施,在一些护理流程措施上的得分也更高。
本研究提供了一种新的、经过验证的养老院临终关怀流程衡量工具。我们的发现表明,各设施之间的护理流程存在广泛差异,这在一定程度上可能源于养老院临终实践缺乏黄金标准。