• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用贾瓦尔角膜曲率计和角膜分析系统(EyeSys)获得的角膜曲率读数比较。

Comparison of keratometric readings as obtained by Javal Ophthalmometer and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys).

作者信息

Tsilimbaris M K, Vlachonikolis I G, Siganos D, Makridakis G, Pallikaris I G

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Health Sciences, University of Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Refract Corneal Surg. 1991 Sep-Oct;7(5):368-73.

PMID:1958623
Abstract

We examined 92 normal eyes using Javal Ophthalmometer and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys) intending to compare the keratometric readings obtained by these two instruments. Dioptric power and location at flatter and steeper meridians, keratometric astigmatism values, and average central keratometric power were measured in the central cornea of all eyes. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in flatter meridians' mean power values (mean difference = 0.13 D, P = .008), mean keratometric astigmatism values (mean difference = -0.20 D, P = .001) and steeper meridians' location (mean difference = 7 degrees, P = .0001). There was no significant difference in steeper meridians' mean power values (mean difference = -0.06 D, P = .38), flatter meridian location (mean difference = 5.9 degrees, P = .07), and mean average central keratometric power (mean difference = 0.03 D, P = .471). Clinically meaningful difference was observed only in keratometric astigmatism readings of eyes with keratometric astigmatism higher than 1.50 D (mean difference = -0.84 D). For all the other parameters measured, the differences between the two instruments readings were clinically acceptable.

摘要

我们使用贾瓦尔角膜曲率计和角膜分析系统(EyeSys)对92只正常眼睛进行了检查,旨在比较这两种仪器所获得的角膜曲率测量值。测量了所有眼睛中央角膜的屈光力以及较平子午线和较陡子午线处的位置、角膜曲率散光值和平均中央角膜屈光力。统计分析显示,较平子午线的平均屈光力值存在显著差异(平均差值 = 0.13 D,P = 0.008)、平均角膜曲率散光值(平均差值 = -0.20 D,P = 0.001)以及较陡子午线的位置(平均差值 = 7度,P = 0.0001)。较陡子午线的平均屈光力值(平均差值 = -0.06 D,P = 0.38)、较平子午线位置(平均差值 = 5.9度,P = 0.07)以及平均中央角膜曲率屈光力(平均差值 = 0.03 D,P = 0.471)均无显著差异。仅在角膜曲率散光高于1.50 D的眼睛的角膜曲率散光读数中观察到具有临床意义的差异(平均差值 = -0.84 D)。对于所测量的所有其他参数,两种仪器读数之间的差异在临床上是可接受的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of keratometric readings as obtained by Javal Ophthalmometer and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys).使用贾瓦尔角膜曲率计和角膜分析系统(EyeSys)获得的角膜曲率读数比较。
Refract Corneal Surg. 1991 Sep-Oct;7(5):368-73.
2
Comparison of keratometric values of healthy and diseased eyes measured by Javal keratometer, EyeSys, and PAR.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997 Apr;23(3):419-22. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80187-3.
3
Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.近视性屈光性角膜切削术后白内障手术人工晶状体屈光度的低估。
Ophthalmology. 1999 Apr;106(4):693-702. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90153-7.
4
Effects of fibrovascular traction and pooling of tears on corneal topographic changes induced by pterygium.纤维血管牵引和泪液积聚对翼状胬肉所致角膜地形变化的影响。
Eye (Lond). 2003 May;17(4):492-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700377.
5
Intraoperative PAR corneal topography system (CTS): comparison of its keratometric readings to manual keratometer, auto-keratometer, EyeSys Corneal Analysis system, and slit lamp PAR CTS in healthy eyes.术中PAR角膜地形图系统(CTS):健康眼其角膜曲率测量读数与手动角膜曲率计、自动角膜曲率计、EyeSys角膜分析系统及裂隙灯PAR CTS的比较
CLAO J. 2000 Jul;26(3):151-8.
6
Comparison of keratometric and topographic cylinder and axis measurements on normal corneas with low astigmatism.正常低散光角膜的角膜曲率计和角膜地形图测量的柱镜度数及轴位比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan-Feb;15(1):8-16. doi: 10.1177/112067210501500102.
7
Comparison of corneal power, corneal astigmatism, and axis location in normal eyes obtained from an autokeratometer and a corneal topographer.比较自动角膜曲率计和角膜地形图仪测量正常眼角膜曲率、角膜散光及散光轴向的差异。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Apr;38(4):648-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.026. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
8
[Clinical experiences with the hand-held keratometer].[手持角膜曲率计的临床经验]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1995 Aug;207(2):81-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035352.
9
Validity of the keratometric index: evaluation by the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera.角膜曲率计指数的有效性:通过Pentacam旋转式Scheimpflug相机进行评估。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.033.
10
Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal.移植片直径对角膜屈光力及拆线前后角膜移植术后散光规则性的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2162-7. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00659-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Keratometry with five different techniques: a study of device repeatability and inter-device agreement.五种不同技术的角膜曲率测量:设备重复性和设备间一致性的研究。
Int Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;34(4):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9895-3. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
2
A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices.使用 8 种不同设备对前角膜力测量值的精度和一致性进行全面评估。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045607. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
3
Clinical evaluation of keratometry and computerised videokeratography: intraobserver and interobserver variability on normal and astigmatic corneas.
角膜曲率计和计算机化视频角膜地形图的临床评估:正常角膜和散光角膜的观察者内及观察者间变异性
Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;82(6):637-42. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.6.637.