• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术室卫生程序效果的实验评估

Experimental evaluation of the efficacy of sanitation procedures in operating rooms.

作者信息

Frabetti Alessia, Vandini Alberta, Balboni Piergiorgio, Triolo Fabio, Mazzacane Sante

机构信息

CIAS Laboratory, Center for the Study of Contamination of Highly Sterile Environments, Department of Architecture, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2009 Oct;37(8):658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.011
PMID:19595481
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There remains much debate on how to define an adequate sanitation protocol in hospital environments.

METHODS

The efficacy of a sanitation protocol in the operating room (OR) of a modern hospital was evaluated by measuring bacterial load on different types of finishing materials of all internal surfaces (ie, walls, floors, and furnishings). Samples were obtained before cleaning and over the subsequent 24 hours. A total of 2124 microbiological samples were collected using RODAC plates and sterile swabs.

RESULTS

The data demonstrate a very significant postsanitation reduction of bacterial load on floors and furnishings; however, no significant data on walls were obtained, because of the low levels of initial contamination (1.50 to 5.98 cfu/100 cm2). The increase in postsanitation bacterial load over time was greater on smooth materials than on porous materials, on which a further reduction in contamination was seen. The study outcomes were confirmed by simulation experiments in which different materials were contaminated with a predetermined bacterial load and then subjected to the sanitation protocol. These simulation experiments were carried out both in vitro and in an eddy-flux testing room that simulated a full-scale OR similar (in terms of architectonic systems) to a real setting.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that the spatial (vertical/horizontal) disposition of materials affects the initial contamination level, which is always much lower on vertical surfaces than on horizontal ones. Moreover, postsanitation bacterial load recovery is dependent on the physical properties of the surface.

摘要

背景

关于如何在医院环境中定义适当的卫生清洁方案仍存在诸多争议。

方法

通过测量现代医院手术室(OR)内所有内表面(即墙壁、地板和家具)不同类型饰面材料上的细菌载量,评估卫生清洁方案的效果。在清洁前及随后的24小时内采集样本。使用RODAC平板和无菌拭子共采集了2124份微生物样本。

结果

数据表明,卫生清洁后地板和家具上的细菌载量显著降低;然而,由于初始污染水平较低(1.50至5.98 cfu/100 cm²),未获得关于墙壁的显著数据。卫生清洁后细菌载量随时间的增加在光滑材料上比在多孔材料上更大,而多孔材料上的污染进一步减少。通过模拟实验证实了研究结果,在模拟实验中,不同材料被预先设定的细菌载量污染,然后进行卫生清洁方案。这些模拟实验在体外以及在一个模拟与真实环境(在建筑系统方面)相似的全尺寸手术室的涡流测试室中进行。

结论

我们的数据表明,材料的空间(垂直/水平)布局会影响初始污染水平,垂直表面的初始污染水平始终远低于水平表面。此外,卫生清洁后细菌载量的恢复取决于表面的物理性质。

相似文献

1
Experimental evaluation of the efficacy of sanitation procedures in operating rooms.手术室卫生程序效果的实验评估
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Oct;37(8):658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.011.
2
Routine disinfection of patients' environmental surfaces. Myth or reality?对患者环境表面进行常规消毒。是神话还是现实?
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Jun;42(2):113-7. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0567.
3
A model system for evaluating surface disinfection in dairy factory environments.用于评估乳制品厂环境表面消毒效果的模型系统。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Feb 28;137(2-3):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.028. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
4
Comparison of floor sanitation methods.地面清洁方法的比较。
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Mar;62(3):346-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.09.021. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
5
Evaluation of the effects of footwear hygiene protocols on nonspecific bacterial contamination of floor surfaces in an equine hospital.评估鞋类卫生规程对一家马医院地面非特异性细菌污染的影响。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Apr 1;228(7):1068-73. doi: 10.2460/javma.228.7.1068.
6
Comparison of cleaning efficacy between in-use disinfectant and electrolysed water in an English residential care home.在英国一家养老院中,使用中的消毒剂与电解水的清洁效果比较。
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Feb;80(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.10.015. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
7
Cleaning methods for ultrasound probes.超声探头的清洁方法。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 May;18(5):286-9.
8
Assessment of materials commonly utilized in health care: implications for bacterial survival and transmission.医疗保健中常用材料的评估:对细菌存活和传播的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2006 Jun;34(5):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.10.008.
9
A microbiological evaluation of hospital cleaning methods.医院清洁方法的微生物学评估。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2007 Aug;17(4):285-95. doi: 10.1080/09603120701372433.
10
[Surface disinfection in nursing homes--what is really happening? Study of control success in three Duisburg nursing homes].[养老院中的表面消毒——实际情况如何?对杜伊斯堡三家养老院控制成效的研究]
Gesundheitswesen. 2004 Oct;66(10):682-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813605.

引用本文的文献

1
Thermal Spray Copper Alloy Coatings as Potent Biocidal and Virucidal Surfaces.作为高效杀菌和杀病毒表面的热喷涂铜合金涂层
J Therm Spray Technol. 2021;30(1-2):25-39. doi: 10.1007/s11666-021-01161-7. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
2
Environmental cleaning and disinfection in the operating room: a systematic scoping review through a human factors and systems engineering lens.手术室环境清洁与消毒:基于人为因素与系统工程学视角的系统范围界定综述。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;45(7):880-889. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.280. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
3
Comparison of Floor Cleaning and Disinfection Processes in a Research Animal Facility.
研究动物设施中地面清洁和消毒过程的比较。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 Nov 1;61(6):644-649. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000042.
4
Evidence Map and Systematic Review of Disinfection Efficacy on Environmental Surfaces in Healthcare Facilities.医疗机构环境表面消毒效果的证据图和系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;18(21):11100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111100.
5
Using an integrative mock-up simulation approach for evidence-based evaluation of operating room design prototypes.运用综合模拟模拟方法,对手术室设计原型进行基于证据的评估。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul;70:288-299. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
Assessment of the Overall and Multidrug-Resistant Organism Bioburden on Environmental Surfaces in Healthcare Facilities.医疗机构环境表面总体及耐多药生物体生物负荷评估
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;37(12):1426-1432. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.198. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
Evaluation of procedures for decontaminating ultrasound probes.超声探头消毒程序的评估
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2012 Jan;39(1):11-4. doi: 10.1007/s10396-011-0332-9. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
8
Hard surface biocontrol in hospitals using microbial-based cleaning products.在医院中使用基于微生物的清洁产品进行硬表面生物控制。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108598. eCollection 2014.
9
Healthcare environments and spatial variability of healthcare associated infection risk: cross-sectional surveys.医疗保健环境与医疗保健相关性感染风险的空间变异性:横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 19;8(9):e76249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076249. eCollection 2013.
10
Comparison of operating field sterility in open versus minimally invasive microdiscectomies of the lumbar spine.腰椎开放与微创显微椎间盘切除术手术视野无菌情况的比较
Surg Neurol Int. 2013 May 6;4(Suppl 5):S295-8. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.111434. Print 2013.