The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
ICF, Durham, NC 27713, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;18(21):11100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111100.
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) contribute to patient morbidity and mortality with an estimated 1.7 million infections and 99,000 deaths costing USD $28-34 billion annually in the United States alone. There is little understanding as to if current environmental surface disinfection practices reduce pathogen load, and subsequently HAIs, in critical care settings. This evidence map includes a systematic review on the efficacy of disinfecting environmental surfaces in healthcare facilities. We screened 17,064 abstracts, 635 full texts, and included 181 articles for data extraction and study quality assessment. We reviewed ten disinfectant types and compared disinfectants with respect to study design, outcome organism, and fourteen indictors of study quality. We found important areas for improvement and gaps in the research related to study design, implementation, and analysis. Implementation of disinfection, a determinant of disinfection outcomes, was not measured in most studies and few studies assessed fungi or viruses. Assessing and comparing disinfection efficacy was impeded by study heterogeneity; however, we catalogued the outcomes and results for each disinfection type. We concluded that guidelines for disinfectant use are primarily based on laboratory data rather than a systematic review of in situ disinfection efficacy. It is critically important for practitioners and researchers to consider system-level efficacy and not just the efficacy of the disinfectant.
医疗保健相关感染(HAI)可导致患者发病率和死亡率上升,据估计,仅在美国,每年就有 170 万例感染和 9.9 万例死亡,造成的损失达 280 亿至 340 亿美元。目前人们对环境表面消毒措施是否能降低重症监护环境中的病原体负荷,进而降低 HAI 的发生,知之甚少。本证据图谱包含了一项关于医疗机构环境表面消毒效果的系统评价。我们筛选了 17064 篇摘要、635 篇全文,并纳入了 181 篇文章进行数据提取和研究质量评估。我们评估了十种消毒剂类型,并就研究设计、目标病原体以及 14 项研究质量指标对消毒剂进行了比较。我们发现,与研究设计、实施和分析相关的研究存在重要的改进领域和空白。消毒实施是消毒效果的决定因素,但在大多数研究中并未测量,而且很少有研究评估真菌或病毒。由于研究存在异质性,评估和比较消毒效果受到了阻碍;然而,我们为每种消毒剂都列出了其消毒效果的结果和数据。我们的结论是,消毒剂使用指南主要基于实验室数据,而不是对现场消毒效果的系统评价。对于从业者和研究人员来说,考虑系统级的效果而非消毒剂的效果至关重要。