Suppr超能文献

用于肺静脉隔离的高密度网状消融导管的初步经验。

Initial experience with the high-density mesh ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation.

作者信息

De Greef Yves, Stockman Dirk, Duytschaever Mattias, Vandekerckhove Yves, Tavernier Rene

机构信息

ZNA Middelheim, Cardiovasular Institute, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Oct;32(10):1286-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02494.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is usually performed with multiple point-by-point radiofrequency ablation with a second multielectrode circular mapping catheter to validate isolation. We evaluated a 30-mm high-density mesh electrode (HDMA) for mapping and PVI in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

In 13 patients (validation group) up to three pulmonary veins (PVs) were targeted with the HDMA. A circular mapping catheter was used to validate PVI. PVI was completed with a CARTO-guided approach (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) followed by a voltage remap. In 11 patients (feasibility group) the HDMA catheter was evaluated as a stand-alone mapping and ablation tool.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy of the HDMA catheter to evaluate PVI was 100%. The encircled low-voltage area (<0.15 mV) after HDMA-guided PVI was smaller compared to CARTO-guided PVI. In the feasibility group 76% of the PVs could be isolated. Complete isolation of all PVs was feasible in five patients (45%) with a mean procedure and fluoroscopy time of respectively 180 +/- 39 minutes and 40 +/- 14 minutes. After 1 year 64% of the patients were free of symptomatic AF.

CONCLUSIONS

The HDMA electrode is a reliable mapping tool to validate PVI. The majority of PVs can be isolated, but on a patient basis touch-up ablations are necessary in more than 50% of the cases. Therefore, modifications in catheter design are required. The small area of voltage abatement points to an ostial left atrium-pulmonary vein disconnection. Initial clinical results in a small number of patients are promising.

摘要

背景

肺静脉隔离(PVI)通常通过多点逐点射频消融结合第二个多电极环形标测导管来验证隔离效果。我们评估了一种30毫米高密度网状电极(HDMA)在复发性心房颤动(AF)患者中进行标测和PVI的效果。

方法

在13例患者(验证组)中,使用HDMA对多达三条肺静脉(PVs)进行靶向操作。使用环形标测导管验证PVI。采用CARTO引导方法(美国加利福尼亚州钻石吧市Biosense Webster公司)完成PVI,随后进行电压重新标测。在11例患者(可行性组)中,将HDMA导管作为独立的标测和消融工具进行评估。

结果

HDMA导管评估PVI的诊断准确性为100%。与CARTO引导的PVI相比,HDMA引导的PVI后环绕的低电压区域(<0.15 mV)更小。在可行性组中,76%的PVs能够被隔离。5例患者(45%)实现了所有PVs的完全隔离,平均手术时间和透视时间分别为180±39分钟和40±14分钟。1年后,6名患者(64%)无有症状性AF。

结论

HDMA电极是验证PVI的可靠标测工具。大多数PVs能够被隔离,但在超过50%的病例中,基于患者个体情况需要进行补充消融。因此,需要对导管设计进行改进。电压降低区域较小表明左心房-肺静脉开口处断开。少数患者的初步临床结果很有前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验