• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进中小企业的心理健康:对“心系企业”项目的评估。

Promoting mental health in small-medium enterprises: an evaluation of the "Business in Mind" program.

作者信息

Martin Angela, Sanderson Kristy, Scott Jenn, Brough Paula

机构信息

School of Management, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2009 Jul 15;9:239. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-239.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-9-239
PMID:19604351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2714843/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Workplace mental health promotion (WMHP) aims to prevent and effectively manage the social and economic costs of common mental illnesses such as depression. The mental health of managers and employees within small-medium enterprises (SMEs) is a neglected sector in occupational health research and practice, despite the fact that this sector is the most common work setting in most economies. The availability and propensity of SME staff to attend face-to-face training/therapy or workshop style interventions often seen in corporate or public sector work settings is a widely recognised problem. The 'Business in Mind' program employs a DVD mode of delivery that is convenient for SME managers, particularly those operating in regional and remote areas where internet delivery may not be optimal. The objective of the intervention program is to improve the mental health of SME managers, and examine whether employees of managers' whose mental health improves, report positive change in their psychosocial work environment. The mechanisms via which we aim to improve managers' mental health are through the development of their psychological capital (a higher order construct comprised of hope, self efficacy, resilience and optimism) and their skills and capacities for coping with work stress.

METHODS/DESIGN: The effectiveness of two versions of the program (self administered and telephone facilitated) will be assessed using a randomised trial with an active control condition (psychoeducation only). We aim to recruit a minimum of 249 managers and a sample of their employees. This design allows for 83 managers per group, as power analyses showed that this number would allow for attrition of 20% and still enable detection of an effect size of 0.5. The intervention will be implemented over a three month period and postal surveys will assess managers and employees in each group at baseline, intervention completion, and at 6 month follow up. The intervention groups (managers only) will also be assessed at 12 and 24 month follow-up to examine maintenance of effects. Primary outcomes are managers' levels of psychological capital (hope, resilience, self-efficacy and optimism), coping strategies, anxiety and depression symptoms, self-reported health, job satisfaction and job tension. Secondary outcomes are participating managers subordinates' perceptions of manager support, relational justice, emotional climate and job tension. In order to provide an economic evaluation of the intervention, both employees and manager rates of absenteeism and presenteeism will also be assessed.

DISCUSSION

The intervention being trialled is expected to improve both primary and secondary outcomes. If proven efficacious, the intervention could be disseminated to reach a much larger proportion of the business community.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852f/2714843/e1e760d34143/1471-2458-9-239-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852f/2714843/fab3466a25c9/1471-2458-9-239-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852f/2714843/e1e760d34143/1471-2458-9-239-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852f/2714843/fab3466a25c9/1471-2458-9-239-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852f/2714843/e1e760d34143/1471-2458-9-239-2.jpg
摘要

背景

职场心理健康促进(WMHP)旨在预防并有效管理诸如抑郁症等常见精神疾病带来的社会和经济成本。尽管中小企业(SMEs)的管理人员和员工的心理健康在职业健康研究和实践中是一个被忽视的领域,但在大多数经济体中,这一领域却是最常见的工作环境。中小企业员工参加企业或公共部门工作环境中常见的面对面培训/治疗或工作坊式干预的可及性和意愿是一个广为人知的问题。“心系企业”项目采用DVD交付模式,这对中小企业经理来说很方便,特别是那些在互联网交付可能不理想的地区和偏远地区经营的经理。干预项目的目标是改善中小企业经理的心理健康,并研究心理健康得到改善的经理的员工是否报告其心理社会工作环境有积极变化。我们旨在改善经理心理健康的机制是通过发展他们的心理资本(一个由希望、自我效能感、恢复力和乐观主义组成的高阶结构)以及他们应对工作压力的技能和能力。

方法/设计:将使用带有积极对照条件(仅心理教育)的随机试验来评估该项目两个版本(自我管理和电话辅助)的有效性。我们的目标是招募至少249名经理及其部分员工作为样本。这种设计每组允许有83名经理,因为功效分析表明这个数量将允许20%的损耗,并且仍然能够检测到0.5的效应量。干预将在三个月内实施,邮政调查将在基线、干预完成时以及6个月随访时对每组中的经理和员工进行评估。干预组(仅经理)还将在12个月和24个月随访时进行评估,以检查效果的维持情况。主要结果是经理的心理资本水平(希望、恢复力、自我效能感和乐观主义)、应对策略、焦虑和抑郁症状、自我报告的健康状况、工作满意度和工作紧张程度。次要结果是参与干预的经理的下属对经理支持、关系公正、情感氛围和工作紧张程度的看法。为了对干预进行经济评估,还将评估员工和经理的缺勤率和出勤主义率。

讨论

正在试验的干预预计将改善主要和次要结果。如果被证明有效,该干预可以推广到更大比例的商业群体。

相似文献

1
Promoting mental health in small-medium enterprises: an evaluation of the "Business in Mind" program.促进中小企业的心理健康:对“心系企业”项目的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jul 15;9:239. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-239.
2
Managers' awareness of mental health measures for their employees in small and medium-sized enterprises in a depopulated mountainous area in Japan: A qualitative study.日本人口稀少山区中小企业管理人员对员工心理健康措施的认知:一项定性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 4;101(9):e28999. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028999.
3
A protocol for the HeadCoach trial: the development and evaluation of an online mental health training program for workplace managers.《HeadCoach 试验方案:开发与评估面向职场经理人的在线心理健康培训项目》
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 29;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1603-4.
4
A study protocol outlining the development and evaluation of a training program for frontline managers on leading well-being and the psychosocial work environment in Danish hospital settings - a cluster randomized waitlist controlled trial.一份研究方案,概述了为丹麦医院环境中的一线经理制定和评估一项关于领导幸福感和心理社会工作环境培训计划的过程——一项集群随机、等待名单对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 10;23(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15728-2.
5
Protecting the Mental Health of Small-to-Medium Enterprise Owners: A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating a Self-Administered Versus Telephone Supported Intervention.保护中小企业所有者的心理健康:一项随机对照试验,评估自我管理与电话支持干预的效果。
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jul;62(7):503-510. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001882.
6
Reducing stigma and increasing workplace productivity due to mental health difficulties in a large government organization in the UK: a protocol for a randomised control treatment trial (RCT) of a low intensity psychological intervention and stigma reduction programme for common mental disorder (Prevail).在英国的一个大型政府组织中,减少因心理健康问题而产生的耻辱感并提高工作场所的生产力:一项针对常见精神障碍(Prevail)的低强度心理干预和减少耻辱感计划的随机对照治疗试验(RCT)的方案。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):896. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09054-0.
7
Psychological distress, related work attendance, and productivity loss in small-to-medium enterprise owner/managers.中小企业所有者/管理者的心理困扰、相关工作出勤和生产力损失。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Oct 15;10(10):5062-82. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10105062.
8
Effectiveness of a workplace-based intervention program to promote mental health among employees in privately owned enterprises in China.基于工作场所的干预方案对促进中国私营企业员工心理健康的效果。
Popul Health Manag. 2013 Dec;16(6):406-14. doi: 10.1089/pop.2012.0113. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Happy@Work: protocol for a web-based randomized controlled trial to improve mental well-being among an Asian working population.《工作中的快乐》:一项基于网络的随机对照试验方案,旨在改善亚洲工作人群的心理健康。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 4;14:685. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-685.
10
Prevention of sick leave at the workplace: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a problem-solving intervention among employees with common mental disorders.预防工作场所病假:一项针对患有常见精神障碍的员工的问题解决干预措施的集群随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1756. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11786-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the occupational stress scale for small and medium-sized enterprise owners for stress prevention measures.用于预防措施的中小企业主职业压力量表的编制
Ind Health. 2025 Apr 1;63(2):164-181. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2023-0206. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
The influence of meaningful work on the mental health of SME employees in the COVID-19 era: can coping strategies mediate the relationship?疫情时代中小企业员工的工作意义对其心理健康的影响:应对策略能否起到中介作用?
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):2435. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17347-3.
3
Does meaningful work mediate the relationship between empowering leadership and mental health? Evidence from Malaysian SME employees.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of the effects of health promotion intervention in the workplace on depression and anxiety symptoms.工作场所健康促进干预对抑郁和焦虑症状影响的荟萃分析。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Jan;35(1):7-18. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1295. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
2
Mental health in the workplace: using the ICF to model the prospective associations between symptoms, activities, participation and environmental factors.工作场所中的心理健康:运用国际功能、残疾和健康分类来构建症状、活动、参与及环境因素之间的前瞻性关联模型。
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(17):1289-97. doi: 10.1080/09638280701654690.
3
Is it worth investing in mental health promotion and prevention of mental illness? A systematic review of the evidence from economic evaluations.
有意义的工作是否能调节赋能型领导与心理健康之间的关系?来自马来西亚中小企业员工的证据。
Front Sociol. 2023 Jul 14;8:1138536. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1138536. eCollection 2023.
4
Enablers and barriers to mental health initiatives in construction SMEs.建筑中小企业心理健康计划的促进因素和障碍。
Occup Med (Lond). 2023 Sep 29;73(6):317-323. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqad075.
5
Supporting employees with mental illness and reducing mental illness-related stigma in the workplace: an expert survey.支持患有精神疾病的员工并减少工作场所与精神疾病相关的耻辱感:专家调查。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Apr;273(3):739-753. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01443-3. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
6
Work-related psychosocial demands related to work organization in small sized companies (SMEs) providing health-oriented services in Germany - a qualitative analysis.德国提供健康导向服务的小型公司(中小企业)中与工作组织相关的工作心理社会需求——一项定性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12700-4.
7
Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings: Protocol for a Pilot Study of the MENTUPP Intervention.职业环境中的心理健康促进和干预:MENTUPP 干预的试点研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 15;19(2):947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020947.
8
Protecting the Mental Health of Small-to-Medium Enterprise Owners: A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating a Self-Administered Versus Telephone Supported Intervention.保护中小企业所有者的心理健康:一项随机对照试验,评估自我管理与电话支持干预的效果。
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jul;62(7):503-510. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001882.
9
Economic Evaluation of Occupational Safety and Health Interventions From the Employer Perspective: A Systematic Review.从雇主角度评估职业安全与健康干预措施的经济学评价:系统综述。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Feb;60(2):147-166. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001224.
10
Providing mental health first aid in the workplace: a Delphi consensus study.在工作场所提供心理健康急救:德尔菲共识研究。
BMC Psychol. 2016 Aug 2;4(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0148-x.
投资于促进心理健康和预防精神疾病是否值得?对经济评估证据的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jan 22;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-20.
4
Process evaluation in occupational stress management programs: a systematic review.职业压力管理项目中的过程评估:一项系统综述
Am J Health Promot. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(4):248-54. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4.248.
5
What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression.自助干预措施在抑郁症状管理中有效的原因是什么?荟萃分析和元回归分析。
Psychol Med. 2007 Sep;37(9):1217-28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000062. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
6
Psychosocial work environment and mental health--a meta-analytic review.心理社会工作环境与心理健康——一项元分析综述
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Dec;32(6):443-62. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1050.
7
Which presenteeism measures are more sensitive to depression and anxiety?哪些出勤主义衡量指标对抑郁和焦虑更为敏感?
J Affect Disord. 2007 Aug;101(1-3):65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.10.024. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
8
Psychosocial benefits of three formats of a standardized behavioral stress management program.标准化行为压力管理计划的三种形式的心理社会效益。
Psychosom Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;68(6):816-23. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000238452.81926.d3.
9
Common mental disorders in the workforce: recent findings from descriptive and social epidemiology.职场中的常见精神障碍:描述性和社会流行病学的最新发现
Can J Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;51(2):63-75. doi: 10.1177/070674370605100202.
10
Injustice at work and incidence of psychiatric morbidity: the Whitehall II study.工作场所的不公正与精神疾病发病率:白厅II研究
Occup Environ Med. 2006 Jul;63(7):443-50. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.022269. Epub 2006 May 12.