Lee Seok Bum, Kim Ki Woong, Youn Jong Choul, Park Joon Hyuk, Lee Jung Jae, Kim Myoung-Hee, Choi Eun Ae, Jhoo Jin Hyeong, Choo Il Han, Lee Dong Young, Woo Jong Inn
Department of Psychiatry, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(1):23-9. doi: 10.1159/000228841. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
We investigated the influence of varying applications of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in community-dwelling Korean elders.
A study population of 1,118 Korean elders was randomly sampled from the residents aged 65 years or older living in Seongnam, Korea. Standardized face-to-face interviews, with neurological and physical examinations, were conducted with 714 respondents. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Korean version of the CERAD Neuropsychological Assessment Battery, digit span test, and lexical fluency test. Activities of daily living were evaluated using the Blessed Dementia Scale in the CERAD Clinical Assessment Battery (Korean version). Using variable sets of operational diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of MCI was estimated.
Age- and gender-standardized prevalence estimates according to the Petersen criteria were 28.6% (95% CI = 25.3-31.9) for overall MCI, 17.0% (95% CI = 14.3-19.8) for amnestic MCI, and 11.5% (95% CI = 9.2-13.9) for non-amnestic MCI. However, the estimated prevalence of MCI varied widely (8.3-27.6%) according to the applied operational diagnostic criteria. The proportion of MCI subtypes also varied considerably according to the number and types of applied neuropsychological tests.
Variable implementation of MCI diagnostic criteria may significantly complicate the homogeneity of this condition.
我们研究了不同诊断标准的应用对韩国社区居住老年人轻度认知障碍(MCI)患病率的影响。
从韩国城南65岁及以上居民中随机抽取1118名韩国老年人作为研究对象。对714名受访者进行了标准化的面对面访谈,并进行了神经学和体格检查。使用韩国版的CERAD神经心理学评估量表、数字广度测试和词汇流畅性测试评估认知功能。使用CERAD临床评估量表(韩国版)中的Blessed痴呆量表评估日常生活活动能力。使用不同的操作性诊断标准集,估计MCI的患病率。
根据彼得森标准,年龄和性别标准化的总体MCI患病率估计为28.6%(95%CI=25.3-31.9),遗忘型MCI为17.0%(95%CI=14.3-19.8),非遗忘型MCI为11.5%(95%CI=9.2-13.9)。然而,根据所应用的操作性诊断标准,MCI的估计患病率差异很大(8.3-27.6%)。MCI亚型的比例也根据所应用的神经心理学测试的数量和类型有很大差异。
MCI诊断标准的不同实施可能会使这种情况的同质性显著复杂化。