• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度认知障碍及其亚型的患病率受诊断标准应用的影响:韩国健康与老龄化纵向研究(KLoSHA)的结果

Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and its subtypes are influenced by the application of diagnostic criteria: results from the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA).

作者信息

Lee Seok Bum, Kim Ki Woong, Youn Jong Choul, Park Joon Hyuk, Lee Jung Jae, Kim Myoung-Hee, Choi Eun Ae, Jhoo Jin Hyeong, Choo Il Han, Lee Dong Young, Woo Jong Inn

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(1):23-9. doi: 10.1159/000228841. Epub 2009 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1159/000228841
PMID:19609083
Abstract

AIMS

We investigated the influence of varying applications of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in community-dwelling Korean elders.

METHODS

A study population of 1,118 Korean elders was randomly sampled from the residents aged 65 years or older living in Seongnam, Korea. Standardized face-to-face interviews, with neurological and physical examinations, were conducted with 714 respondents. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Korean version of the CERAD Neuropsychological Assessment Battery, digit span test, and lexical fluency test. Activities of daily living were evaluated using the Blessed Dementia Scale in the CERAD Clinical Assessment Battery (Korean version). Using variable sets of operational diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of MCI was estimated.

RESULTS

Age- and gender-standardized prevalence estimates according to the Petersen criteria were 28.6% (95% CI = 25.3-31.9) for overall MCI, 17.0% (95% CI = 14.3-19.8) for amnestic MCI, and 11.5% (95% CI = 9.2-13.9) for non-amnestic MCI. However, the estimated prevalence of MCI varied widely (8.3-27.6%) according to the applied operational diagnostic criteria. The proportion of MCI subtypes also varied considerably according to the number and types of applied neuropsychological tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Variable implementation of MCI diagnostic criteria may significantly complicate the homogeneity of this condition.

摘要

目的

我们研究了不同诊断标准的应用对韩国社区居住老年人轻度认知障碍(MCI)患病率的影响。

方法

从韩国城南65岁及以上居民中随机抽取1118名韩国老年人作为研究对象。对714名受访者进行了标准化的面对面访谈,并进行了神经学和体格检查。使用韩国版的CERAD神经心理学评估量表、数字广度测试和词汇流畅性测试评估认知功能。使用CERAD临床评估量表(韩国版)中的Blessed痴呆量表评估日常生活活动能力。使用不同的操作性诊断标准集,估计MCI的患病率。

结果

根据彼得森标准,年龄和性别标准化的总体MCI患病率估计为28.6%(95%CI=25.3-31.9),遗忘型MCI为17.0%(95%CI=14.3-19.8),非遗忘型MCI为11.5%(95%CI=9.2-13.9)。然而,根据所应用的操作性诊断标准,MCI的估计患病率差异很大(8.3-27.6%)。MCI亚型的比例也根据所应用的神经心理学测试的数量和类型有很大差异。

结论

MCI诊断标准的不同实施可能会使这种情况的同质性显著复杂化。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and its subtypes are influenced by the application of diagnostic criteria: results from the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA).轻度认知障碍及其亚型的患病率受诊断标准应用的影响:韩国健康与老龄化纵向研究(KLoSHA)的结果
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(1):23-9. doi: 10.1159/000228841. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
2
Implementing diagnostic criteria and estimating frequency of mild cognitive impairment in an urban community.在城市社区实施轻度认知障碍的诊断标准并估计其发生率
Arch Neurol. 2005 Nov;62(11):1739-46. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.11.1739.
3
A nationwide survey on the prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in South Korea.一项针对韩国痴呆症和轻度认知障碍患病率的全国性调查。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(2):281-91. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101221.
4
VITA: subtypes of mild cognitive impairment in a community-based cohort at the age of 75 years.VITA:75岁社区队列中轻度认知障碍的亚型
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 May;20(5):452-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.1311.
5
Prevalence and classification of mild cognitive impairment in the Cardiovascular Health Study Cognition Study: part 1.心血管健康研究认知研究中轻度认知障碍的患病率及分类:第1部分
Arch Neurol. 2003 Oct;60(10):1385-9. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.10.1385.
6
Mild cognitive impairment in the general population: occurrence and progression to Alzheimer disease.普通人群中的轻度认知障碍:发生率及向阿尔茨海默病的进展
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;16(7):603-11. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181753a64.
7
Mild cognitive impairment as predictor for Alzheimer's disease in clinical practice: effect of age and diagnostic criteria.轻度认知障碍在临床实践中作为阿尔茨海默病的预测指标:年龄和诊断标准的影响
Psychol Med. 2008 Jan;38(1):113-22. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000554. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
8
Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes.轻度认知障碍:四种临床亚型的长期病程
Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2176-85. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249117.23318.e1.
9
Conversion from subtypes of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer dementia.轻度认知障碍亚型向阿尔茨海默病痴呆的转化。
Neurology. 2007 Jan 23;68(4):288-91. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252358.03285.9d.
10
Including persistency of impairment in mild cognitive impairment classification enhances prediction of 5-year decline.将认知障碍持续存在纳入轻度认知障碍分类可提高对 5 年下降的预测。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Feb;26(1):26-37. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq093. Epub 2010 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
CERAD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) Neuropsychology Assessment Battery: 35 Years and Counting.CERAD(阿尔茨海默病研究联盟)神经心理学评估工具包:35 年的历程与展望。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;93(1):1-27. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230026.
2
The complex burden of determining prevalence rates of mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review.确定轻度认知障碍患病率的复杂负担:一项系统评价。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 23;13:960648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.960648. eCollection 2022.
3
Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in community-dwelling Chinese populations aged over 55 years: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
55 岁及以上社区居住的中国人中轻度认知障碍的患病率:荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01948-3.
4
Comparison of neurodegenerative types using different brain MRI analysis metrics in older adults with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's dementia.使用不同的脑 MRI 分析指标比较认知正常、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病痴呆老年人的神经退行性类型。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220739. eCollection 2019.
5
Practice guideline update summary: Mild cognitive impairment: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.实践指南更新概要:轻度认知障碍:美国神经病学学会指南制定、传播和实施小组委员会的报告。
Neurology. 2018 Jan 16;90(3):126-135. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004826. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
6
Epidemiology of mild cognitive impairment in Brazil.巴西轻度认知障碍的流行病学
Dement Neuropsychol. 2013 Oct-Dec;7(4):363-366. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642013DN74000002.
7
Mild cognitive impairment: Profile of a cohort from a private sector memory clinic.轻度认知障碍:来自私立记忆诊所队列的概况。
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2014 Jul;17(3):340-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.138523.
8
Traditional Korean East Asian medicines and herbal formulations for cognitive impairment.传统韩国东亚医学和草药配方治疗认知障碍。
Molecules. 2013 Nov 26;18(12):14670-93. doi: 10.3390/molecules181214670.