Frisch Sabine, Zittermann Armin, Berthold Heiner K, Götting Christian, Kuhn Joachim, Kleesiek Knut, Stehle Peter, Körtke Heinrich
Klinik für Thorax- und Kardiovaskularchirurgie, Herzzentrum NRW, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2009 Jul 18;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-8-36.
We investigated whether macronutrient composition of energy-restricted diets influences the efficacy of a telemedically guided weight loss program.
Two hundred overweight subjects were randomly assigned to a conventional low-fat diet and a low-carbohydrate diet group (target carbohydrate content: >55% energy and <40% energy, respectively). Both groups attended a weekly nutrition education program and dietary counselling by telephone, and had to transfer actual body weight data to our clinic weekly with added Bluetooth technology by mobile phone. Various fatness and fat distribution parameters, energy and macronutrient intake, and various biochemical risk markers were measured at baseline and after 6, and 12 months.
In both groups, energy intake decreased by 400 kcal/d compared to baseline values within the first 6 months and slightly increased again within the second 6 months. Macronutrient composition differed significantly between the groups from the beginning to month 12. At study termination, weight loss was 5.8 kg (SD: 6.1 kg) in the low-carbohydrate group and 4.3 kg (SD: 5.1 kg) in the low-fat group (p = 0.065). In the low-carbohydrate group, triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels were lower at month 6 and waist circumference and systolic blood pressure were lower at month 12 compared with the low-fat group (P = 0.005-0.037). Other risk markers improved to a similar extent in both groups.
Despite favourable effects of both diets on weight loss, the carbohydrate-reduced diet was more beneficial with respect to cardiovascular risk factors compared to the fat-reduced diet. Nevertheless, compliance with a weight loss program appears to be even a more important factor for success in prevention and treatment of obesity than the composition of the diet.
Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00868387.
我们研究了能量限制饮食的宏量营养素组成是否会影响远程医疗指导的减肥计划的效果。
200名超重受试者被随机分为传统低脂饮食组和低碳水化合物饮食组(目标碳水化合物含量分别为>55%能量和<40%能量)。两组均参加每周一次的营养教育计划并通过电话接受饮食咨询,且必须每周通过手机利用蓝牙技术向我们的诊所传输实际体重数据。在基线、6个月和12个月时测量各种肥胖和脂肪分布参数、能量和宏量营养素摄入量以及各种生化风险标志物。
在两组中,与基线值相比,能量摄入量在最初6个月内每天减少400千卡,在第二个6个月内又略有增加。从开始到第12个月,两组之间的宏量营养素组成存在显著差异。在研究结束时,低碳水化合物组体重减轻5.8千克(标准差:6.1千克),低脂组体重减轻4.3千克(标准差:5.1千克)(p = 0.065)。与低脂组相比,低碳水化合物组在第6个月时甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平较低,在第12个月时腰围和收缩压较低(P = 0.005 - 0.037)。两组中其他风险标志物的改善程度相似。
尽管两种饮食对减肥都有有益效果,但与低脂饮食相比,低碳水化合物饮食在心血管危险因素方面更有益。然而,对于肥胖的预防和治疗,坚持减肥计划似乎比饮食组成更是成功的一个更重要因素。
Clinicaltrials.gov,编号为NCT00868387。