Schulz Richard, Czaja Sara J, Lustig Amy, Zdaniuk Bozena, Martire Lynn M, Perdomo Dolores
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, 121 University Place, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Rehabil Psychol. 2009 Feb;54(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0014932.
To assess the efficacy of two psychosocial interventions for caregivers of older persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).
A multisite, three-group, randomized controlled trial comparing two active intervention conditions with each other and to an information-only control group. One hundred seventy-three caregiver and care-recipient dyads were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: a caregiver-only treatment condition in which caregivers received a multicomponent intervention based on their risk profile; a dual-target condition in which the caregiver intervention was complemented by a treatment targeting the care recipient, designed to address both caregiver and care recipient risk factors; and an information-only control condition in which the caregiver received standard printed information about caregiving, SCI, and aging.
A multivariate outcome comprised of six indicators linked to the goals of the interventions was the primary outcome of the study. The multivariate outcome included measures of depressive symptoms, burden, social support and integration, self-care problems, and physical health symptoms.
At 12 months, caregivers in the dual-target condition had improved quality of life as measured by our multivariate outcome when compared to the control condition. Using the dyad as the unit of analysis, the dual-target condition was superior to both the control condition and the caregiver-only condition in our multivariate outcomes analysis. Dyads enrolled in the dual-target condition had significantly fewer health symptoms than control condition and caregiver-only condition participants and were less depressed when compared to participants in the caregiver-only condition. In follow-up analyses we found that a higher proportion of caregivers in the dual-target condition had clinically significant improvements in depression, burden, and health symptoms when compared with the caregiver-only condition.
Caregivers are in need of and can benefit from interventions that help them manage the medical and functional limitations of the care recipient. Intervention strategies that target both the caregiver and care recipient are particularly promising strategies for improving the quality of life of caregivers.
评估两种心理社会干预措施对老年脊髓损伤(SCI)患者照料者的疗效。
一项多中心、三组随机对照试验,将两种积极干预条件相互比较,并与仅提供信息的对照组进行比较。173对照料者与被照料者被随机分配到三种条件之一:仅照料者治疗条件,即照料者根据其风险状况接受多成分干预;双目标条件,即照料者干预辅以针对被照料者的治疗,旨在解决照料者和被照料者的风险因素;仅提供信息的对照条件,即照料者接受关于照料、SCI和衰老的标准印刷信息。
由与干预目标相关的六个指标组成的多变量结局是该研究的主要结局。多变量结局包括抑郁症状、负担、社会支持与融入、自我照料问题和身体健康症状的测量。
在12个月时,与对照条件相比,双目标条件下的照料者在我们的多变量结局测量中生活质量得到改善。以二元组作为分析单位,在我们的多变量结局分析中,双目标条件优于对照条件和仅照料者条件。参与双目标条件的二元组的健康症状明显少于对照条件和仅照料者条件的参与者,并且与仅照料者条件的参与者相比,抑郁程度更低。在随访分析中,我们发现与仅照料者条件相比,双目标条件下有更高比例的照料者在抑郁、负担和健康症状方面有临床上显著的改善。
照料者需要并能从有助于他们应对被照料者医疗和功能限制的干预措施中受益。针对照料者和被照料者的干预策略是改善照料者生活质量的特别有前景的策略。