Segal B, Lam E, Amar J, Bressler B, Halparin L, Ramji A, Telford J, Whittaker S, Enns R
University of British Columbia, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;23(7):485-8. doi: 10.1155/2009/956809.
Although most procedures in the endoscopy clinic are elective, emergency add-on cases in hospital-based endoscopy clinics are common, frequently consuming a great deal of time and resources relative to elective endoscopy procedures.
To determine which specific factors correlate with the high volume of add-on emergency cases in a tertiary care, hospital-based endoscopy unit.
A retrospective chart review of all gastrointestinal add-on, and electively booked cases of esophagastroduodenoscopy (EGD), colonoscopy(C) and flexible sigmoidoscopy(FS)procedures from September 2006 to May 2007, was conducted. The day of the week, month, type of procedure and physician were recorded. Emergency add-on procedures performed during the weekends were not assessed. These cases were then compared with elective cases during a similar time frame to determine differences in the aspects of add-on cases versus those that were elective.
Seven hundred twenty-one add-on cases were reviewed (mean patient age 57.4 years; 46% women) and compared with 736 elective cases (mean age 56 years; 49% women; P not significant). Of the add-on cases, 377 (52%) were EGD, 216 C (30%) and 105 (15%) were FS, with 23 combined procedures (3.2%) versus 202 (27%) EGD, 442 (60%) C and 74 (10%) FS in the elective group. Add-on cases were more likely to be EGDs than elective cases (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.8 to 4.3; P<0.0001) and less likely to be Cs (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.38; P<0.0001). There were significantly more add-on cases on Mondays (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.28; P>0.03). Conversely, there were significantly fewer procedures added on Fridays (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.57; P=0.0001). There were statistically fewer add-on cases in September compared with the other months that were evaluated (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.78; P=0.0006).
With the present system of performing only emergency cases on the weekend, Monday tends to have more add-on cases. Consistent with the fact that upper gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common emergency condition, EGD is more common in add-on cases than with elective cases. Although speculative, the reasons for Friday having fewer add-on cases may be the result of a change of physician on call that day; consequently, most cases may be performed earlier in the week. For unknown reasons, fewer cases tend to be added on in September than in the other months evaluated. These data demonstrate that even in the same institution with similar patients, variability in the number of add-on cases likely is a result of many additional factors governing add-on cases, which require appropriate resource planning to ensure adequate allocation of services to ensure ideal patient care.
尽管内镜诊疗室的大多数检查都是选择性的,但医院内镜诊疗室的急诊加做病例很常见,相对于选择性内镜检查,这些病例常常耗费大量时间和资源。
确定在一家三级医疗的医院内镜科室中,哪些特定因素与大量急诊加做病例相关。
对2006年9月至2007年5月所有胃肠道急诊加做病例以及选择性预约的食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)、结肠镜检查(C)和乙状结肠镜检查(FS)病例进行回顾性图表分析。记录检查日期、月份、检查类型和医生。未评估周末进行的急诊加做检查。然后将这些病例与同一时间段内的选择性病例进行比较,以确定急诊加做病例与选择性病例在各方面的差异。
共审查了721例急诊加做病例(患者平均年龄57.4岁;46%为女性),并与736例选择性病例(平均年龄56岁;49%为女性;P值无统计学意义)进行比较。在急诊加做病例中,377例(52%)为EGD,216例(30%)为C,105例(15%)为FS,23例(3.2%)为联合检查;而在选择性病例组中,202例(27%)为EGD,442例(60%)为C,74例(10%)为FS。急诊加做病例中EGD的比例高于选择性病例(比值比[OR]2.7;95%置信区间[CI]1.8至4.3;P<0.0001),而C的比例低于选择性病例(OR 0.24;95% CI 0.15至0.38;P<0.0001)。周一的急诊加做病例显著更多(OR 1.7;95% CI 1.0至2.28;P>0.03)。相反,周五加做的检查显著更少(OR 0.3;95% CI 0.16至0.57;P=0.0001)。与其他评估月份相比,9月的急诊加做病例在统计学上更少(OR 0.31;95% CI 0.11至0.78;P=0.0006)。
在目前仅在周末进行急诊病例检查的系统下,周一往往有更多的急诊加做病例。与上消化道出血是最常见的急诊情况这一事实一致,急诊加做病例中EGD比选择性病例更常见。尽管只是推测,但周五急诊加做病例较少可能是由于当天值班医生更换的结果;因此,大多数病例可能在本周早些时候进行。原因不明的是,9月加做的病例比其他评估月份少。这些数据表明,即使在同一机构、面对相似患者,急诊加做病例数量的差异可能是由许多其他影响急诊加做病例的因素导致的,这需要进行适当的资源规划,以确保服务的充分分配,从而为患者提供理想的护理。