Service User Research Enterprise, PO34 Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;56(4):389-401. doi: 10.1177/0020764009106618. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
User involvement in health services has been a priority for government since 1990. In mental health, concern has been expressed that involved service users (activists) are not representative of 'ordinary' patients.
(i) To investigate service users' perceptions of the outcomes of user involvement in two London boroughs. (ii) To determine whether the perceptions of outcomes differ between activists and non-activists.
The study was user-led. The user-researchers compiled a semi-structured interview schedule which they then administered to a sample of 40 people; 20 were defined as activists and 20 as non-activists. There were also 20 participants in each borough.
Activists were aware of more user groups and forms of user involvement than non-activists. However, in terms of perceptions of the outcomes of user involvement, there was little difference between the activists and non-activists.
There is very little extant work on the outcomes of user involvement in mental health services. This study examined this and, contrary to reservations often expressed, there was little difference between activists and non-activists.
This is a pilot study. Further work should examine perceptions of the outcomes of user involvement by other stakeholders, for example, front-line workers, managers, carers and commissioners.
自 1990 年以来,用户参与卫生服务一直是政府的重点。在精神卫生领域,人们一直担心参与服务的用户(活动家)不能代表“普通”患者。
(i)调查伦敦两个行政区的服务用户对用户参与结果的看法。(ii)确定活动家和非活动家对结果的看法是否存在差异。
该研究由用户主导。用户研究人员编制了一份半结构化访谈大纲,然后由 40 人组成的样本进行管理;其中 20 人被定义为活动家,20 人被定义为非活动家。每个行政区也有 20 名参与者。
活动家比非活动家更了解更多的用户群体和形式的用户参与。然而,就用户参与结果的看法而言,活动家和非活动家之间几乎没有区别。
关于精神卫生服务中用户参与的结果,几乎没有现有的工作。本研究对此进行了检验,与人们经常表达的保留意见相反,活动家和非活动家之间几乎没有区别。
这是一项试点研究。进一步的工作应该检查其他利益相关者,例如一线工作人员、管理人员、照顾者和决策者对用户参与结果的看法。