Ledgerwood David M
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48207, USA.
Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2008 Nov;1(3):340-9. doi: 10.2174/1874473710801030340.
Each year, smoking-related illnesses are among the leading causes of preventable death in the U.S. and in many other countries. Although recently there have been substantial developments in pharmaceutical and behavioral smoking cessation treatments, these interventions do not work for all individuals, necessitating development of a wider array of treatments. Despite demonstrated efficacy in several studies, contingency management (CM) is a behavioral intervention that is not widely used as a smoking cessation treatment. This review surveys the current research literature on the efficacy of CM for smoking reduction, and identifies some of the most prominent barriers to wider implementation of CM as a stop-smoking treatment. Suggestions are made for future research to design behavioral smoking cessation programs that may be applied as a treatment for smokers in the community.
每年，在美国以及许多其他国家，与吸烟相关的疾病都是可预防死亡的主要原因之一。尽管近期在药物和行为戒烟治疗方面取得了重大进展，但这些干预措施并非对所有个体都有效，因此需要开发更多种类的治疗方法。尽管在多项研究中已证明应急管理（CM）具有疗效，但它作为一种戒烟治疗方法，是一种未被广泛应用的行为干预措施。本综述调查了当前关于CM减少吸烟效果的研究文献，并确定了更广泛地将CM用作戒烟治疗方法的一些最突出障碍。针对未来研究提出了建议，以设计可应用于社区吸烟者治疗的行为戒烟项目。
