Department of Clinical Research, Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Fargo, ND 58103, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Oct;47(10):897-900. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.06.018. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
Laboratory studies have shown considerable differences between the eating behavior, particularly binge eating behavior, of participants with and without binge eating disorder (BED). However, these findings were not replicated in two field experiments employing ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in which obese BED and obese non-BED participants reported comparable binge eating behavior. In the current study, we examined differences in binge eating with an innovative assessment scheme employing both EMA and a standardized computer-based dietary recall program to avoid some of the limitations of past laboratory and field research. Obese BED, obese non-BED, and non-obese control participants reported significant differences in eating patterns, loss of control, overeating, and binge eating behavior. Of particular importance was the finding that BED participants engaged in more overeating and more binge eating episodes than non-BED participants. These findings suggest that the use of EMA in combination with dietary recall may be a relatively objective and useful approach to assessing binge eating behavior. The findings further suggest that individuals with BED are observably different from those without the disorder, which may have implications for eating disorder diagnoses in DSM-V.
实验室研究表明,患有暴食症(BED)和未患暴食症的参与者之间在饮食行为方面存在显著差异,尤其是暴食行为。然而,在两项采用生态瞬时评估(EMA)的现场实验中,这些发现并未得到证实,其中肥胖的 BED 和肥胖的非 BED 参与者报告了类似的暴食行为。在当前的研究中,我们采用了一种创新的评估方案,结合 EMA 和标准化的基于计算机的饮食回忆程序,以避免过去实验室和现场研究的一些局限性,来研究暴食行为的差异。肥胖的 BED、肥胖的非 BED 和非肥胖的对照组参与者在饮食模式、失控感、暴饮暴食和暴食行为方面报告了显著差异。特别重要的是发现 BED 参与者比非 BED 参与者更容易过度进食和出现更多的暴食发作。这些发现表明,将 EMA 与饮食回忆相结合可能是评估暴食行为的一种相对客观和有用的方法。这些发现进一步表明,患有 BED 的个体与没有该障碍的个体明显不同,这可能对 DSM-V 中的饮食障碍诊断产生影响。