Suppr超能文献

[基层医疗中惊恐障碍治疗方案的树状决策分析]

[Tree decision analysis of the therapeutic alternatives for Panic Disorders in Primary Care].

作者信息

Navarro-Mateu Fernando, Garriga-Puerto Ascensión, Sánchez-Sánchez Juan Antonio

机构信息

Unidad de Docencia, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Murcia, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2010 Feb;42(2):86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 24.

Abstract

AIMS

To analyse the different therapeutic alternatives for Panic Disorders to make it easier to make collaborative treatment decisions between patients and doctors in a Primary Care setting.

DESIGN

Quantitative analysis by a decision tree.

DATA SOURCES

Time period reviewed; 1990-2008 in Med-line, Embase, Cochrane-plus Library and Tripdatabase. Terms used "panic disorder", "psychotherapy" and "drug therapy".

METHODS

I) A decision tree was prepared with only one therapeutic option in each arm; II) The same procedure with two sequential therapeutic options; III) Sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of the model.

STUDY SELECTION

Evidence summary, systematic reviews, meta-analysis and clinical guidelines.

RESULTS

Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) obtains the highest usefulness (UME=0.58), followed by the Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) (UME=0.53) and by the tricyclic antidepressants (UME=0.44). CBT followed by SSRI is the therapeutic sequence with the highest usefulness (0.62). The sensitivity analysis suggests the model is not robust enough.

CONCLUSIONS

The CBT in monotherapy or followed by SSRI in a sequential strategy would be the options with the highest usefulness. The results are not robust enough because they can clearly vary with changes in the most important variables in a reasonable range.

摘要

目的

分析恐慌症的不同治疗选择,以便在初级保健环境中患者和医生更容易做出联合治疗决策。

设计

通过决策树进行定量分析。

数据来源

回顾的时间段;1990 - 2008年见于医学在线数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、考科蓝图书馆和循证医学数据库。使用的检索词为“恐慌症”、“心理治疗”和“药物治疗”。

方法

I)准备一个决策树,每个分支只有一种治疗选择;II)对两个连续治疗选择采用相同程序;III)进行敏感性分析以测试模型的稳健性。

研究选择

证据总结、系统评价、荟萃分析和临床指南。

结果

认知行为疗法(CBT)效用最高(效用均值UME = 0.58),其次是选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)(UME = 0.53)和三环类抗抑郁药(UME = 0.44)。先采用CBT然后使用SSRI是效用最高的治疗顺序(0.62)。敏感性分析表明该模型不够稳健。

结论

单一疗法的CBT或之后采用顺序策略使用SSRI将是效用最高的选择。结果不够稳健,因为在合理范围内随着最重要变量的变化它们可能会明显不同。

相似文献

2
[Management of panic disorder in the elderly].[老年惊恐障碍的管理]
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2020 Sep 1;18(3):295-304. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2020.0878.
8
Treatments for panic disorder.惊恐障碍的治疗方法。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;53 Suppl:14-9.
9
Treatment of panic disorder.惊恐障碍的治疗。
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Feb 15;71(4):733-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Brief intervention for anxiety in primary care patients.基层医疗患者焦虑症的简短干预
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):175-86. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080078.
3
Combined psychotherapy plus benzodiazepines for panic disorder.联合心理治疗与苯二氮䓬类药物治疗惊恐障碍。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD005335. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005335.pub2.
7
Cost effectiveness of acute imipramine therapy versus two imipramine maintenance treatment regimens for panic disorder.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Oct;18(4):383-91. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018040-00006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验