Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jan;101 Suppl 1:S109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.008. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
In this study, two conversion technologies--methanol synthesis and ethanol fermentation--were compared and CO(2) mitigation effect was estimated. The biomethanol production process was revealed as being preferable to the bioethanol process in terms of thermal efficiency, carbon conversion and environmental burden except electrical energy consumption. When biofuels are employed in internal combustion engines, biomethanol has greater potential for gasoline substitution, but the difference in expected CO(2) reduction is rather small due to higher power consumption in methanol production. Consequently, from a short-term perspective, bioethanol is preferable since it can readily substitute the gasoline for conventional vehicles. From a long-term perspective, however, biomethanol has greater potential for gasoline substitution and CO(2) mitigation.
在这项研究中,比较了两种转化技术——甲醇合成和乙醇发酵,并估算了它们的 CO2减排效果。就热效率、碳转化率和环境负担(不包括电能消耗)而言,生物甲醇生产工艺优于生物乙醇工艺。当生物燃料在内燃机中使用时,生物甲醇在替代汽油方面具有更大的潜力,但由于甲醇生产过程中电力消耗较高,预计 CO2减排量的差异很小。因此,从短期来看,由于生物乙醇可以很容易地替代传统汽车的汽油,因此它更可取。然而,从长期来看,生物甲醇在替代汽油和减少 CO2排放方面具有更大的潜力。